Hi,
Correct me if i am wrong but wicket and tapestry are based on different
philosophies. Tapestry IOC is the recognition by tapestry that there are
certain services that are presentation services and require an exclusive
support in the presentation layer. That does not mean that tapestry IOC
cann
Hi all,
I am writing a service I intend to inject into some pages and components:
public MyPage
{
@Inject private MyService myService;
}
I want MyServiceImpl to have access to ComponentResources
public MyServiceImpl implements MyService
{
@Inject private ComponentResources componentRes
hi i need advice on this,
i use springsecurity to authenticiate user, then if success, on Home.page,
copy the user object to tapestry4 user. this work fine. but sometime, the
tapestry4 session timeout. what is the proper way to integrate tapestry 4
session user with springsecurity? need change t
Hallo Sebastian,
Well, you will always need the ObjectProvider, and it in turn will
always need a number of services, either virtual or realized. Maybe
there is a way to draw dependency diagrams so you can really see what is
going on (but as far as I know, this information isn't available from
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:19:01 -0200, Igor Drobiazko
wrote:
Tapestry team created a shared Twitter account to post news on Tapestry.
Please follow us and retwitt, if you want to help us to make the
framework more successful.
https://twitter.com/#!/ApacheTapestry/
By the way, if you write a
Tapestry team created a shared Twitter account to post news on Tapestry.
Please follow us and retwitt, if you want to help us to make the framework
more successful.
https://twitter.com/#!/ApacheTapestry/
--
Best regards,
Igor Drobiazko
http://tapestry5.de
Per your request, issue filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1353
Adam
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Adam Zimowski wrote:
> Will do and agreed.
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>> Please add an issue, but I don't see this as a blocker for Tapestry 5.
is the error message you're referring to the 'BlackBird' error popup?
if you want to disable it set SymbolConstants.BLACKBIRD_ENABLED to false
in your Module.
p.
On 23/11/2010 5:51 AM, Michael Taylor wrote:
Greetings Tapestry users,
I have a question about ajax refreshing zones.
I have a pa
Alejandro,
Would you mind posting your Realm implementation?
I tried just providing a CacheManager to the constructor for
AuthorizingRealm but there must be something else missing as i still
have 2 problems:
1. The SimpleAccount is not being cached after the credentials have been
checked (i
Hi,
I use tapestry for more than one year now, and I'm very pleased with. I use
it daily at work with mvn jetty:run and I much appreciate hot class
reloading for pages and components.
But at home I'm trying to use it to develop a Google App Engine Application,
and I use the maven plugin net.kindl
This is a very good day! Congrats!
2010/11/22 Kalle Korhonen
> Ta daa! This time we are announcing a dual release of
> tapestry-security, versions 0.2.1 for T5.1.x and 0.3.0 for T5.2.x!
> Probably not much of a surprise anymore as I've hinted at numerous
> occasions about the new releases but an
Hi Tom,
I wasn't surprised by the number of services to be prepared either as proxy or
to be created. I just don't see a reason why the object provider which I add as
last provider is called for framework internal services. There is just no need
to call it at all for those services.
--
Best
Will do and agreed.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Please add an issue, but I don't see this as a blocker for Tapestry 5.2.
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Adam Zimowski wrote:
>
>> Thank You Howard ! Yes, I moved the file to subfolder "resources",
>> changed my
I think you are right. Easy way out is to add
withMarker(...).preventReloading();
Service reloading enabled by default can be frustrating when you hit
issues, but overall I think the benefits outweigh the harms.
Kalle
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Felix Gonschorek
wrote:
> hi all,
>
> we a
I would document this as a "gotcha". The idea of putting the marker
annotation right in the service implementation class seems odd ... it ends
up creating a binding from the clients of the service to the implementation,
which can't be moved, renamed, or have its visibility changed without
breaking
Please add an issue, but I don't see this as a blocker for Tapestry 5.2.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Adam Zimowski wrote:
> Thank You Howard ! Yes, I moved the file to subfolder "resources",
> changed my annotation to:
>
> @Import(library="classpath:/resources/util.js")
>
> Modified the mod
Good points !
2010/11/22 Javier Molina
> I haven't explored the site thoroughly, but here are some comments:
>
> - in general, the new site looks prettier
>
> - it doesn't look good to have a "Tapestry 5.2.3 -- canceled" post on the
> front page. It's scary and you have to read the rest to know
hi all,
we are currently in progress to migrate our application from tapestry 5.1.0.5 to
tapestry 5.2.4 - we encounter some minor challenges, but the following was hard
to solve:
In Tapestry 5.2.4 a service with a single interface and multiple implemenations
which are discriminated with an marker
Thank You Howard ! Yes, I moved the file to subfolder "resources",
changed my annotation to:
@Import(library="classpath:/resources/util.js")
Modified the module:
configuration.add("js", "resources");
And Viola ! Works. I guess I exercised extreme scenario :)
Adam
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:04
In 5.2 there is a new method in RequestGlobals named getActivePageName().
See here:
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.2-dev/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/RequestGlobals.html#getActivePageName%28%29
2010/11/22 Antonio Fernández
>
> Hi all, Greetings from Málaga :) !!!
>
> - Congratul
Looks like a bug; you should move around the assets to deeper folders, that
should solve the problem. Alternate, the ClasspathAssetManager should
reject your contribution ... you really should package these things deeper,
somewhere inside your library or applications' root package; that was the
in
Greetings Tapestry users,
I have a question about ajax refreshing zones.
I have a page that contains a number of custom components each of which has
its own zone that gets refreshed via ajax.
I've noticed that if there is a problem on the server side when executing
the ajax refresh tapestry dynami
OpenID is well within our scope. I have done Oauth & Oauth 2 integrations
but haven't found the time yet to generalize the implementation. There's
quite a bit more work to do for general use compared to making it work just
for your webapplication. I trust in code and patches are always welcome.
Ka
Great,
Congratulations on that. Although used in a closed-source commercial project
based on T5, if the general idea of using OpenID or similar Identity
standards was also within scope for tapestry-security or something to build
on it, I'd be glad to share my experience and thoughts where the info
Katia,
I'm neither obsessed with ATG or Oracle, nor with SpringSource and their
products (as some may feel a little bit about Matt's ranking [?]) just
putting some of the more "Vertical" or Business capable examples into a much
smaller list, than he did there with a whole lot of different framewor
Hi,
Congratulations for your work !
@Kalle and Tynamo users
Is somebody interested on finishing the Tynamo Hotel-Booking-Demo ?
Security works fine, but it will be vry interesting to finish the work
using conversations module too.
Just drop me an e-mail if somebody is interested on working
Ta daa! This time we are announcing a dual release of
tapestry-security, versions 0.2.1 for T5.1.x and 0.3.0 for T5.2.x!
Probably not much of a surprise anymore as I've hinted at numerous
occasions about the new releases but announcing still has its place
since major dependencies changed. Most impo
@Werner :
It might be a matter of my low English level, but I can't even understand
the half of your thoughts. Moreover, I still don't get your obsession with
ATG, which is a commercial product not a framework and which has a very very
very expensive license.
But It doesn't matter, I quit this poi
Minor typo... I also had a stylesheet which is inconsequential to this
and I removed it from the e-mail. The import really is:
@Import(library="classpath:util.js")
Adam
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Adam Zimowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my component class I have:
>
> @Import(stylesheet="library
Hi,
In my component class I have:
@Import(stylesheet="library="classpath:util.js")
In the module:
public static void
contributeClasspathAssetAliasManager(MappedConfiguration configuration) {
// see http://markmail.org/thread/rq4vp7hi437smsrh
configuration.add("js", "/");
}
The file util.js l
Back to the DevoXX discussion, it has clearly lost some momentum now, that
JavaOne was moved to the Sep/Oct timeslot, and DevoXX itself was even
shifted almost a month itself. While even the announcements and great news
of last year (Java getting Closures[?]) were not as close to becoming reality
a
Hi all, Greetings from Málaga :) !!!
- Congratulations for the new Layout of the Web Site.
- Thanks for this really active/useful mailing list, I founded a lot of
solutions
and interesting news about 3rd Libraries, upgradings and books ( here we
continue
waiting the english translation of th
Thanks for sharing those.
>From the "complete stack" point of view, it clearly exceeds Tapestry, Spring
MVC, Seam and most others, but given the aggressive product policy
SpringSource/vmware follows with almost everything wrapped in Spring now
(yesterday Social Networking, today Android) they have
Hey,
yeah, that is exactly what I am seeing. Thanks for that - looking into it
now.
Regards,
Zubair
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-2-4-issue-tp3273778p3275616.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
thx - scrolling is fine now in IE
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 17:16, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> if you commit the fix to
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tapestry/tapestry-site/branches/post-5.2-site/styles/style.css
> the problem will be fixed immediately.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Uli
>
> Am 22.11.
>
>> Could it help Tapestry to find adoption in the Wicket-world?
>
> I don't think so. Both frameworks have similarities (components and pages
> treated as objects), but very different approaches.
The web-frameworks have different approaches, yes, but Wicket has no own IOC
module. What I see
Andreas,
if you commit the fix to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tapestry/tapestry-site/branches/post-5.2-site/styles/style.css
the problem will be fixed immediately.
Thanks,
Uli
Am 22.11.2010 16:07, schrieb Andreas Andreou:
thx for pointing that out - i see similar problem in IE8 and ha
This is on my list for 5.3. I already started working on it but will commit
it after 5.2 is final.
I don't intend to pass the official TCK as there are too many differences.
Just using JSR-330 annotations in Tapestry pages, components and service is
fine.
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Werner K
thx for pointing that out - i see similar problem in IE8 and have
tracked it down to
a css rule that seems to mess up IE... should be fixed in a little while
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:37, Yunhua Sang wrote:
> Congratulations for the new site, it looks a lot better.
>
> One problem, The new site
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:15:27 -0200, Howard Lewis Ship
wrote:
We're still working out the kinks ... and I've been working hard on
revising the tutorial ... but at long last, we're debuting the new
Tapestry Web Site:
http://tapestry.apache.org/
This is absolutely awesome. The weakest part
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:48:16 -0200, Werner Keil
wrote:
For this bigger move, T5 IOC should really adopt to JSR 330 annotations
where those are included,
I think there's a JIRA for that.
or has it already happened for sure with 5.2?
Not yet.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:36:50 -0200, Christian Riedel
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hi!
I started a little project today: I made a module for Wicket so that it
uses Tapestry IOC for injection (I'm not joking, seriously :-))!
Tapestry-IoC is not Tapestry-the-web-framework, the former is used by th
you should consider redirecting from
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/
to
http://tapestry.apache.org/
with code 301 so that it becomes result #1 here:
http://www.google.de/search?hl=en&q=tapestry+5
what do you think?
Am 22.11.2010 um 15:37 schrieb Yunhua Sang:
> Congratulations for the ne
Congratulations for the new site, it looks a lot better.
One problem, The new site does not work properly with IE7, which is the only
one I can use in my company. Somehow I cannot scroll the page down, and
"page down" key also doesn't work.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wro
Hi Paul
The AuthorizingRealm constructor can take a CacheManager as a parameter.
In our case we use the EhCacheManager.
That's all you need!
Cheers.
Alejandro
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Paul Stanton wrote:
> Kalle,
>
> I'm think I'm making progress however I haven't found a good guide
Hi Zubair
Is this your error: http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#IllegalAccessError ?
> This error is caused by the static initilizer of the LoggerFactory class
> attempting to directly access the SINGLETON field of
> org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder. While this was allowed in SLF4J 1.5.5 and
> ea
I think the new site is an excellent start. I agree with Javier's comments and
would like to add that the red stop signs in the tutorial are a worry. For
instance, the first one:
"This chapter may look long, but almost all of it is one-time setup for Maven
and Eclipse. The actual Tapestry part
I agree. Well thought out Javier.
Regards,
Greg
On 22/11/2010, at 9:11 PM, Geoff Callender
wrote:
> Very good observations, all of them.
>
> On 22/11/2010, at 8:37 PM, Javier Molina wrote:
>
>> I haven't explored the site thoroughly, but here are some comments:
>>
>> - in general, the ne
Javier,
you are cordially invited to help out by contributing your proposed
changes: Please file an ICLA [1] with secret...@apache.org and I'll
grant you write access to the wiki.
The same holds for everyone. Once your ICLA is on file you may start
contributing to the documentation.
Uli
[
Very good observations, all of them.
On 22/11/2010, at 8:37 PM, Javier Molina wrote:
> I haven't explored the site thoroughly, but here are some comments:
>
> - in general, the new site looks prettier
>
> - it doesn't look good to have a "Tapestry 5.2.3 -- canceled" post on the
> front page. I
I haven't explored the site thoroughly, but here are some comments:
- in general, the new site looks prettier
- it doesn't look good to have a "Tapestry 5.2.3 -- canceled" post on
the front page. It's scary and you have to read the rest to know that
it's just a release that didn't pass the vot
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Igor Drobiazko
wrote:
> Great. Thanks to all who was involved.
Yep! ... If anyone of you will come here to Italy I owe you a bottle
of red wine! Amazing job.
Cheers
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
---
52 matches
Mail list logo
