How to integrate tacos 4.1 in Tapestry 4.0

2011-05-13 Thread nazarhussain_s
hi, I am a novice in Tapestry and using Tapestry 4.0 currently. I have to develop AJAX Functionality in Tapestry 4.0 . For that one suitable option that i found was Tacos. Can anybody provide info on how to integrate Tacos in Tapestry 4.0 .(or is there any other more optimistic solution

@Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Clément Uster
Hi everyone, I have a tricky question for you. :) Let's imagine I have a component (coming from a component library) that has an index property. So index has the @Property annotation. I want to create a component that extends the previous component. And I want to test index's value to change

Re: How to integrate tacos 4.1 in Tapestry 4.0

2011-05-13 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 13 May 2011 09:03:52 -0300, nazarhussain_s nazar...@gmail.com wrote: hi, Hi! I am a novice in Tapestry and using Tapestry 4.0 currently. Just curious: why 4.0 and not 5.2 or at least 4.1? Existing project? -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:11:19 -0300, Clément Uster clement.us...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, Hi! Let's imagine I have a component (coming from a component library) that has an index property. So index has the @Property annotation. I want to create a component that extends the previous

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Clément Uster
Thanks for your very quick answer. :) What do you suggest if extending component isn't recommended ? Rewritting it ? I can't create getters and setters since the component belongs to another library. I guess this shouldn't happen if the component had more entry points. 2011/5/13 Thiago H. de

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Taha Hafeez
You can use composition Embed that component inside your component, and publish its properties. See the last topics of this page http://tapestry.apache.org/component-parameters.html regards Taha 2011/5/13 Clément Uster clement.us...@gmail.com Thanks for your very quick answer. :) What

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:37:18 -0300, Clément Uster clement.us...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your very quick answer. :) :) What do you suggest if extending component isn't recommended ? Rewritting it ? In many scenarios you can solve problems by creating a mixin. Could you describe in

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Clément Uster
Thanks Taha and Thiago. This is an old corporate lib, that isn't supposed to evolve anymore. It has a simple loop, and I want to change what is displayed for a particular index (by adding an if component, testing the value of index). 2011/5/13 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 13 May 2011 11:53:19 -0300, Clément Uster clement.us...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Taha and Thiago. Hi! This is an old corporate lib, that isn't supposed to evolve anymore. This scenario isn't very good . . . It has a simple loop, and I want to change what is displayed for a

Re: Validating forms inside a loop

2011-05-13 Thread Steve Eynon
Hi, I've put the above into a Mixin, which works fine, but the implementation is a little leaky i.e. the containing component needs to define it as an Implementation Mixin and set the tracker name / context in the onPrepareForSubmit event. I've been trying to change it so that the mixin can be

Re: Who uses Tapestry ? ... eOfficeo!!!

2011-05-13 Thread mkariji
Hi , Now you have a running demo application for eofficeo : * https://demo.officeo.fr/demo* The English version will be finished in a few weeks, but the current version is almost finished. All comments and suggests are welcome. Thank you Mourad 2011/2/3 bagou [via Tapestry Users]

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Clément Uster
This is an old corporate lib, that isn't supposed to evolve anymore. This scenario isn't very good . . . Indeed... The component was frozen with tapestry 5.1.0.5 and the need was too urgent to wait for a release. But, ok ! No worries. :) It has a simple loop, and I want to change

Updating only specific divs in Zone update

2011-05-13 Thread Rich M
Hi, I'm trying to put together an interactive page with multiple components, where each component can go through event/actions. For example, two components might be account details and reports. In account details the initial view is a display of your basic fields and their values, but if

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:52:36 -0300, Clément Uster clement.us...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I understand. Interesting approach, thanks. It's one of what I consider one of the hidden gems of Tapestry: its server-side DOM. This may cause a lot of pain ! I'm not following you . . . So, can I

Re: Updating only specific divs in Zone update

2011-05-13 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 13 May 2011 14:06:46 -0300, Rich M rich...@moremagic.com wrote: Hi, Hi! Use multiple zones instead of a single one and return a MultiZoneUpdate in your event handler method. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,

Re: Updating only specific divs in Zone update

2011-05-13 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 13 May 2011 14:49:47 -0300, Rich M rich...@moremagic.com wrote: I'm sorry, I'm not sure I fully understand how that would work. Wouldn't that re-render all the other zones as well? I'm trying to isolate just one of the components and not update the other ones. No. You just add to

Re: TAP5-920 rears it's head again in 5.2 with a twist

2011-05-13 Thread Rich M
I've run into this issue now myself, was there ever a resolution to this or a workaround? As David said, supply an explicit value encoder isn't able to solve the issue for me either. Thanks, Rich On 03/24/2011 10:52 PM, David Rees wrote: TAP5-920 has long been an issue for one of our

Re: TAP5-920 rears it's head again in 5.2 with a twist

2011-05-13 Thread David Rees
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Rich M rich...@moremagic.com wrote: I've run into this issue now myself, was there ever a resolution to this or a workaround? As David said, supply an explicit value encoder isn't able to solve the issue for me either. My brute force workaround was to disable

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

2011-05-13 Thread Clément Uster
This may cause a lot of pain ! I'm not following you . . . I just meant this won't be easy to manipulate generated DOM with java, but if it's the only way, I can deal with that. So, can I conclude that the use of @Property wouldn't be recommended within components ? Because (even