On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:00 PM Ajay Arora wrote:
> Thank you the quick response and solution.
>
> is this way of putting the headers gives us any advantages over having
> filter in front of Tapestry filter like may be better performance ?
>
I cannot think how any option would be faster than the
I don't think the list: prefix is part of Tapestry itself, but of a
third-party module. Anyway, any context not dead simple is better served by
being done in Java instead of the template. That's the Tapestry philosophy.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:17 PM Ross, Cyndy wrote:
>
> try
>
