+1
> On 27 Nov 2018, at 12:16 pm, Christopher Dodunski
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I only started with Tapestry, seriously, around 18 months ago. Tapestry
> may not be the latest fashion, but I love its convention over
> configuration approach, use of POJOs, and the myriad other elegant
>
Hi all,
I only started with Tapestry, seriously, around 18 months ago. Tapestry
may not be the latest fashion, but I love its convention over
configuration approach, use of POJOs, and the myriad other elegant
features that keep web application development fun and rewarding.
I guess technical
I was recently working on a project with React components connected to
controllers in C# to provide the API for the back end. Development is slow and
tedious because there’s lots of boilerplate code, although there is the benefit
of some component reuse.
Looking at the react components
Thiago,
It seems you cannot read English. I was suggesting Angular and Spring
backend services being exposed via Rest to the Angular. It's seems all you
know is Tapestry and nothing else. The world is bigger than Tapestry, boy;-)
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:52 PM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:24 AM Emmanuel Sowah wrote:
> There we go again. Instead of engaging in constructive arguments, you
> behave like a child with comments like "Don't feed the trolls". Pathetic.
>
Replacing a mostly-server-side framework with a JavaScript client-side
library isn't what
hello,
the bootique suggestion is the fastest suggestion so far.
just download or clone the project,
adjust pom.xml to use import dependency version 0.25 rather than the
snapshot of 0.24, and you are ready to go...
d.
John,
The easiest way to set up a starter project using Maven is to use the
Tapestry Maven archetype -- see the "Create your first Tapestry project"
section at getting-started.html
On Nov 26, 2018 12:53 AM, "Qbyte Consulting"
wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to setup a bare bones tapestry project in
Sent from BlueMail
On Nov 26, 2018, 09:21, at 09:21, Juicy Cocktail
wrote:
>Here is something I throw at you: 綾
>
>Best Regards,
>Rafael
>
>P.S. Don’t feed the trolls.
>
>
>> On Nov 26, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote:
>>
>> But is web application framework not an overkill for
Juicy,
There we go again. Instead of engaging in constructive arguments, you
behave like a child with comments like "Don't feed the trolls". Pathetic.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:21 AM Juicy Cocktail
wrote:
> Here is something I throw at you: 綾
>
> Best Regards,
> Rafael
>
> P.S. Don’t feed the
Juicy,
There is a whole better world out there other than Tapestry related stuffs.
Why not go for the real meat instead of bootique-tapestry?
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:20 AM Juicy Cocktail
wrote:
> I also recommend to take a look at bootique-tapestry. It fits into a more
> modern deployment
Here is something I throw at you: 綾
Best Regards,
Rafael
P.S. Don’t feed the trolls.
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote:
>
> But is web application framework not an overkill for this small application
> you are building? Something you could quickly do with Angular in a
Numa,
That's exactly the point I am making. In this modern era of application,
the bloated web application framework we are used to are simply an overkill
for most projects. And arcane too. Do your front end with the tools like
Javascript frameworks that does the job well on the client side. And
I also recommend to take a look at bootique-tapestry. It fits into a more
modern deployment workflow.
Best,
Rafael
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 9:15 AM, Numa Schmeder wrote:
>
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> I would be happy to hear what framework you would recommend instead of
> trolling.
> Clearly you don’t
But is web application framework not an overkill for this small application
you are building? Something you could quickly do with Angular in a more
efficient way.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:12 AM Qbyte Consulting
wrote:
> Setting up a tapestry project for building a trivial webapp for back
>
Hi Emmanuel,
I would be happy to hear what framework you would recommend instead of trolling.
Clearly you don’t seem to be well informed as Tapestry is a java server side
web framework and Angular is a client side javascript framework.
You can’t compare them as they absolutely don’t do the same
Setting up a tapestry project for building a trivial webapp for back office
data entry is still very efficient.
Angular is a glorified java script library, not a web application framework.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 26 Nov 2018, at 14:09, Emmanuel Sowah wrote:
>
> Dude,
>
> Really setting up
16 matches
Mail list logo
