On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 5:38 AM Numa Schmeder wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
>
Hello!
> Thank you for your feedback, yes indeed, I have checked the code of the
> property binding and the antler syntax.
> Indeed it compiles byte code based on real method signature, so you can’t
> be to generic or it won’t
Hi Thiago,
Thank you for your feedback, yes indeed, I have checked the code of the
property binding and the antler syntax.
Indeed it compiles byte code based on real method signature, so you can’t be to
generic or it won’t find the method you have written.
I will look into chenille kit for
