Re: Equivalent of jwcid="$content$" in T5

2008-06-02 Thread Andrew Pietsch
-ideal > solution without patching. I have some ideas, but I'll have to look into > the feasibility of any of them before I'll suggest them, lest I sent you > barking up the wrong tree. > > Robert > > > On Jun 2, 2008, at 6/23:03 AM , Andrew Pietsch wrote: > &

Re: Equivalent of jwcid="$content$" in T5

2008-06-02 Thread Andrew Pietsch
rted that content outside of the > element isn't rendered. I haven't duplicated that behavior. > And it's quite contrary to what is supposed to do, since it's > supposed to be a root element. > > Short answer is that there is currently /no/ equivalent in T5 of $c

Re: Equivalent of jwcid="$content$" in T5

2008-06-01 Thread Andrew Pietsch
ed to you by your designer, sorry cant' help! If you find or if > > somebody else knows please let us know. > > > > > > > > 2008/6/1 Andrew Pietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Does T5 have an equivalent of the $conten

Re: Equivalent of jwcid="$content$" in T5

2008-06-01 Thread Andrew Pietsch
Hi Robert, Thanks for that. As I see it seems to be the inverse of what I want. It excludes it's children from the output, whereas $content$ excludes everything but its children from the output. Does anyone know if the equivalent functionality is planned? Cheers Andrew On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 a

Re: Equivalent of jwcid="$content$" in T5

2008-06-01 Thread Andrew Pietsch
you can use the Layout > component. However if you are trying to $remove$ a tag from some html > returned to you by your designer, sorry cant' help! If you find or if > somebody else knows please let us know. > > > > 2008/6/1 Andrew Pietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > &g

Equivalent of jwcid="$content$" in T5

2008-05-31 Thread Andrew Pietsch
Hi all, Does T5 have an equivalent of the $content$ and $remove$ components found in previous versions? I've been looking but can't seem to find anything (except perhaps the DiscardBody body mixin for $remove$). Thanks Andrew

Re: T5: Possible Literal Binding bug

2007-12-07 Thread Andrew Pietsch
T5 will assume you meant to use literal binding when you use a > value > with expansions, like "... ${val1} ... ${val2}". > So "literal" prefix is only necessary for a simple value, like "abc". > > Cheers, > Jeffrey Ai > > > Andrew Pietsch wrote

T5: Possible Literal Binding bug

2007-12-04 Thread Andrew Pietsch
Hi there, I'm new to T5 so the I hope this isn't just a user misunderstanding but I'm having troubles with the prefix "literal:" Page class: public class MyComponent { @Parameter private String title; } A Template that uses MyComponent as follows: The resulting output is: literal: Page 1