o code. I guess, same goes for navigation.
So, I guess there will not be a Spring Web Flow integration from Tapestry
side unless Spring takes the effort.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:54 AM, John Jimmy Dondapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:21 AM,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Lubor Gajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't forget you can add new object scopes to Tapestry.
>
> The main problem here is not definition of conversation scope, but
> specification of conversation boundaries (when the conversation should
> start
> and when it
I am sorry if this has already been asked but is there anyway to integrate
Spring Web Flow 2.x with Tapestry 5.x?
Reasons :
1. I like the way SWF organizes the flow outside the code.
2. please add your own reasons.
--
Cheers,
John
Hi Renat,
First thanks for the detailed discussion.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Renat Zubairov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hello John,
>
>
> >>
> >> In this case, you wouldn't use the page activation context, as you're
> >> filling the page properties yourself. As Tapestry uses
> redirect-a
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:23:05 -0300, John Jimmy Dondapati <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> Here are the options with T5 (from what we could dig up) :
>> 2. Pass on
Hi,
We are evaluating Tapestry for a couple of months and are very
interested in using it in a huge project that will have a minimum of 30k
users when it goes up. Since T5 is not yet production ready we are seeking
for advice to know how scalable Tapestry forms can be.
We need a multipage for
