On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:01:49 -0200, Kristian Marinkovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thank you all for your input...
Domain Objects sometimes (quite often:)) need other services
to meet their function.
In this cases, I create a controller class and put the method the
implements that function
, you might choose the 2nd or the 3rd
way. In this case, I am favoring the 3rd way.
P.S.
We have used the combination of 1st and 3rd way in a medium-scale e-commerce
software.
Cheers,
Jeffrey Ai
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-T5--injecting-services-into-Domain
hi all,
is it possible to use tapestry-ioc to inject services into domain
objects? i'm thinking of something like @Configurable in spring.
when using (build-time) AOP i need a reference to the registry,
but how do i get it? preferably i'd assign the generated proxy
to the fields.
i'd
notification;
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-T5--injecting-services-into-Domain-Objects-tp14250305p14258571.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Well, having a Registry instance in some class is what you would do if
you were to run Tapestry 5 IoC as part of a non-web application.
I guess you could subclass TapestryFilter and override the init method
to get a hold of the Registry for retrieval through a static getter,
although I'm not
It's better to have a simple singleton factory to contain the registry.
Plus if you were crazy enough to put it into a domain object as a reference
(or any service reference) you need to make sure it's marked as transient so
it will be ignored when serialization occurs for the domain object.
On
Oh, I wasn't talking about sticking it in a class. That'd be... ugh. No.
I meant to have some class, presumably a singleton, hold the Registry.
But certainly not a domain object. Never. Ever.
-Filip
Paul Cooley skrev:
It's better to have a simple singleton factory to contain the registry.
I meant domain class, sorry.
Filip S. Adamsen skrev:
Oh, I wasn't talking about sticking it in a class. That'd be... ugh. No.
I meant to have some class, presumably a singleton, hold the Registry.
But certainly not a domain object. Never. Ever.
-Filip
Paul Cooley skrev:
It's better to
thank you all for your input...Domain Objectssometimes (quite often:)) needother services to meet their function. if you retrieve your entities from sayHibernateyou can use the Tuplizer to inject any other services you need. You can also achieve this if you ALWAYS create your Domain Objects using
. Adamsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: 10.12.2007 09:08PM
Thema: Re: [T5] injecting services into Domain Objects
I meant domain class, sorry.
Filip S. Adamsen skrev:
Oh, I wasn't talking about sticking it in a class. That'd be... ugh. No.
I meant to have some class, presumably a singleton
10 matches
Mail list logo
