Re: [T5.0.5] Caching and IE6

2007-08-24 Thread Siddhartha Argollo
With auto-links I wanted to say links to the same page. For example, when the user clicks the link, a condition for an if is met, rendering a block. With IE, instead of the new state of the page, it shows the same state before the click. I will be foreced to break the logic in several pages,

Re: [T5.0.5] Caching and IE6

2007-08-24 Thread Josh Canfield
On 8/24/07, Siddhartha Argollo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With auto-links I wanted to say links to the same page. For example, when the user clicks the link, a condition for an if is met, rendering a block. With IE, instead of the new state of the page, it shows the same state before the click.

Re: [T5.0.5] Caching and IE6

2007-08-23 Thread Gabriel Lozano
In my case I´m not using an ajax request, normal request but I have to hit the refresh button to see the changes. 2007/8/22, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I don't know what an auto link is - but if you are creating ajax requests then you have to do something stupid like: // pseudo

Re: [T5.0.5] Caching and IE6

2007-08-23 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I'm not familiar with that kind of caching. Almost sounds like a proxy could be sitting between you and the content - being overzealous in caching.. I guess a header or similar things could be done of course to eliminate this - at least until it's time to start doing perf optimizations. On

Re: [T5.0.5] Caching and IE6

2007-08-22 Thread Siddhartha Argollo
That's the problem. The meta tag isn't working... Gabriel Lozano wrote: Hi, I have had the same problem. I have a page for managing the items in a list (select list). But when i go to the page where the list is I have to hit the refresh button. By the way, does the meta content worked? Hope

Re: [T5.0.5] Caching and IE6

2007-08-22 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I don't know what an auto link is - but if you are creating ajax requests then you have to do something stupid like: // pseudo javascript var url = url; url += new Date(); Otherwise ie will see the same url and not bother to make the request. (a premature optimization I guess) On 8/22/07,