In the testng.xml you can exclude groups:
...
and in eclipse you create a test runner to run a specified testng.xml file. So
you could create an xml with only your unit tests.
This is also the reason I asked because I wanted to know if other people tagged
all their un
Yeah,
I think someone else wanted to make an attempt at the maven2 support
but kind of let the ball drop. I've said I'll bring it back up to the
right version, have just been wrestling with not having a core
computer for the last week or so to work on. (I do now)
And yes, the IDEA TestNG plugin
Betreff: [very OT] group conventions for people use testng?
hey guys, just wondering. if you use testng how do you normally
structure your groups? Do you always specific a group for unit tests or
do you not?
--
Dan Adams
Senior Software Engineer
Interactive Factory
617.235.5857
I believe Jesse put together the 2.8-SNAPSHOT version of the plugin
that we're using.
On 2/1/07, Patrick Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dan,
I wanted to ask about this also.
Howard,
I know that you have a version of the surefire plugin that can run testNG
5.1 tests but the testNG ve
Hi Dan,
I wanted to ask about this also.
Howard,
I know that you have a version of the surefire plugin that can run testNG
5.1 tests but the testNG version is now up to 5.4 and the "official" version
of the surefire plugin seems to be languishing with testNG 4.7. Does anyone
know what is g
In IDEA, you can supply "test runner options" to TestNG. I would
imagine that the eclipse plugin has something similar, but I have not
used it.
On 2/1/07, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I meant from inside Eclipse, or as specified in testng.xml.
I haven't upgraded my version of t
I meant from inside Eclipse, or as specified in testng.xml.
I haven't upgraded my version of the plugin, perhaps this is a feature
they've added. I also want to see if parallel works properly in a more
recent version.
On 2/1/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you tried -excludegro
Have you tried -excludegroups ?
I think that works.
On 2/1/07, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really only structure things in two ways: fast vs. slow, aka default
vs. integration.
I think if I was building an application, I may add additional groups
to cover tests that need spe
I really only structure things in two ways: fast vs. slow, aka default
vs. integration.
I think if I was building an application, I may add additional groups
to cover tests that need special setup to run (assuming I couldn't do
that myself).
I wish TestNG had an option to exclude named groups fr
hey guys, just wondering. if you use testng how do you normally
structure your groups? Do you always specific a group for unit tests or
do you not?
--
Dan Adams
Senior Software Engineer
Interactive Factory
617.235.5857
-
To uns
10 matches
Mail list logo
