It's just to include some javascript that includes a < or a >.
E.g.
...
if (counter > 1) {
...
}
...
This will be rendered by T5 as ..
...
if (counter > 1) {
...
}
...
.. which is broken.
2011/1/17 Josh Canfield
> Putting it in an html comment didn't work? Can you share a snippet t
Putting it in an html comment didn't work? Can you share a snippet that is
broken? The smallest possible.
On Jan 17, 2011 3:34 AM, "Gunnar Eketrapp"
wrote:
> I encountered this problem again ..
>
> I.e. am adding javascript dynamically but expresions such as
>
> foo < bar
>
> ... gets translated i
Yea it can be solved but the code that I ported generated javascript inside
template code so the easy way was to just do the same in T5 ...
2011/1/17 Luke Wilson
> Perhaps you can you engineer it so you use addScript and pass all dynamic
> items to a constructor, keeping your JS in a separate f
Perhaps you can you engineer it so you use addScript and pass all dynamic items
to a constructor, keeping your JS in a separate file.
Luke
On 17 Jan 2011, at 12:33, Gunnar Eketrapp wrote:
> No that didn't work either.
>
> 2011/1/17 Luke Wilson
>
>> Does enclosing the JS in a CData section h
No that didn't work either.
2011/1/17 Luke Wilson
> Does enclosing the JS in a CData section help?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDATA
>
> Luke
>
> On 17 Jan 2011, at 11:40, Gunnar Eketrapp wrote:
>
> > This ugly hack solved the problem but is far from what we want :-)
> >
> >if
Does enclosing the JS in a CData section help?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDATA
Luke
On 17 Jan 2011, at 11:40, Gunnar Eketrapp wrote:
> This ugly hack solved the problem but is far from what we want :-)
>
>if (counter 1) {
>
> /Gunnar
>
> 2011/1/17 Gunnar Eketrapp
>
>> I en
This ugly hack solved the problem but is far from what we want :-)
if (counter 1) {
/Gunnar
2011/1/17 Gunnar Eketrapp
> I encountered this problem again ..
>
> I.e. am adding javascript dynamically but expresions such as
>
> foo < bar
>
> ... gets translated into ...
>
> foo < bar
I encountered this problem again ..
I.e. am adding javascript dynamically but expresions such as
foo < bar
... gets translated into ...
foo < bar
... and fails to execute ...
I tried the hide from parser method as Josh mentioned but T5 was not that
easy to fool ...
Is there any easy way to t
Use the good old html/xml comment, used for years to hide javascript from
old browsers.
var fromPage = '${pojo.property }';
//<-- hide javascript from xml parser.
// -->
On Dec 21, 2010 11:13 PM, "Gunnar Eketrapp"
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am in the process of adding some jquery-ui controls.
>
> For
Hi and thanks for the tip!
I tried it but got the same error ...
Question: Wich doctype is the preferred one when using T5.2.
I am using
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
TIA, Gunnar
2010/12/22 Borut Bolčina
> Hi,
>
> might be unrelated, but add the following DOCTYPE at t
Hi,
might be unrelated, but add the following DOCTYPE at the very top of your
TML:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
-Borut
2010/12/22 Gunnar Eketrapp
> Hi!
>
> I am in the process of adding some jquery-ui controls.
>
> For testing purposes I added a javascript sectio
Hi!
I am in the process of adding some jquery-ui controls.
For testing purposes I added a javascript section in my TML file but I then
got errors like ...
Failure parsing template classpath:utskicket/pages/group/SelectMembers.tml:
The entity name must immediately follow the '&' in the entity ref
12 matches
Mail list logo
