RE: Changing the behavior of short-circuiting render phases (re: TAP5-128, TAP5-126)

2008-11-19 Thread Doug Hauge
y, November 17, 2008 1:28 AM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: Re: Changing the behavior of short-circuiting render phases > (re: TAP5-128, TAP5-126) > > hi doug, > > all we can do is to reopen the bug and vote for it ... :) > > > > i guess one of the reasons why

Re: Changing the behavior of short-circuiting render phases (re: TAP5-128, TAP5-126)

2008-11-17 Thread Kristian Marinkovic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 15.11.2008 01:57 Bitte antworten an "Tapestry users" An "Tapestry users" Kopie "Doug Hauge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Adam Ayres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matt Ayres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thema Changing the

Changing the behavior of short-circuiting render phases (re: TAP5-128, TAP5-126)

2008-11-14 Thread Doug Hauge
As of Tapestry 5.0.16 (after the fix for TAP5-128), we are now running into a problem related to that described in TAP5-126. You closed the TAP5-126 issue saying that the code was behaving as documented and designed, but it seems that this behavior leads to problems when trying to implement generi