y, November 17, 2008 1:28 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Changing the behavior of short-circuiting render phases
> (re: TAP5-128, TAP5-126)
>
> hi doug,
>
> all we can do is to reopen the bug and vote for it ... :)
>
>
>
> i guess one of the reasons why
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
15.11.2008 01:57
Bitte antworten an
"Tapestry users"
An
"Tapestry users"
Kopie
"Doug Hauge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Adam Ayres"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matt Ayres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thema
Changing the
As of Tapestry 5.0.16 (after the fix for TAP5-128), we are now running
into
a problem related to that described in TAP5-126. You closed the TAP5-126
issue
saying that the code was behaving as documented and designed, but it
seems
that this behavior leads to problems when trying to implement generi