Thanks, that was very helpful
On Mar 7, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:28:32 -0300, Lenny Primak
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks guys for your insight. So is there any reason not to pick tapestry
>> IOC in favor of other frameworks? Are you saying that t
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:28:32 -0300, Lenny Primak
wrote:
Thanks guys for your insight. So is there any reason not to pick
tapestry IOC in favor of other frameworks? Are you saying that tap IOC
is the best?
IMHO, I'd say that Tapestry-IoC is the best IoC framework I've ever seen
from a
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Lenny Primak wrote:
> Thanks guys for your insight. So is there any reason not to pick tapestry IOC
> in favor of other frameworks? Are you saying that tap IOC is the best?
It's the best suited for Tapestry, I'll say that much. I think
Tapestry IoC has a lot of
Thanks guys for your insight. So is there any reason not to pick tapestry IOC
in favor of other frameworks? Are you saying that tap IOC is the best?
On Mar 7, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> What Thiago and Juan are getting at is that Tapestry's IoC was
> specifically designed
please also try not to call it J2EE 6 that unlucky term (J2EE) was supposed
to disappear even before Oracle took over Sun [?]
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Lenny Primak wrote:
> Is there an executive summary of the differences or something like that?
> I am trying to decide whether to use Tape
What Thiago and Juan are getting at is that Tapestry's IoC was
specifically designed to be a framework IoC container, where multiple
modules would be "glued" together at runtime in configurations that
would not be known at the time any individual module was built. In
other words, you stack these t
Another great feature from Tapestry IOC is how easy is to write well
designed applications using Design Patterns like Chains of
responsibilities, Strategies or Pipelines. U will be able to write
truly modular applications using them together with the Distributed
Configuration mentioned by Thiago.
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:40:15 -0300, Lenny Primak
wrote:
Is there an executive summary of the differences or something like that?
I am trying to decide whether to use Tapestry's IoC or J2EE CDI in my
application. The only CDI I've used in the past is Google Guice.
See
http://blog.tapestr
Is there an executive summary of the differences or something like that?
I am trying to decide whether to use Tapestry's IoC or J2EE CDI in my
application.
The only CDI I've used in the past is Google Guice.
Thanks
-
To unsubscri
