Hi,
a lot of time gone froml this post was sent.
Have found any solution for your problem?
Would you tell it?
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Grid-is-there-any-way-dynamically-defined-columns-tp4866376p5716374.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:15:47 -0300, resign sergejb...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
a lot of time gone froml this post was sent.
Have found any solution for your problem?
Would you tell it?
The solution was already posted in this thread: create your own BeanModel
and PropertyConduit.
--
.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Grid-is-there-any-way-dynamically-defined-columns-tp4866376p4870409.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
an expression on the bean and then
execute the expression on the bean to get the grid cell value.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Grid-is-there-any-way-dynamically-defined-columns-tp4866376p4866376.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive
://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Grid-is-there-any-way-dynamically-defined-columns-tp4866376p4866376.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
Will that work for a data model consisting of Object[]?
-Norman
On Oct 3, 2011, at 9:39 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:07:48 -0300, Norman Franke nor...@myasd.com
wrote:
You should implement your own BeanModel and it can do whatever it
wants.
Or @Inject
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:09:18 -0300, Norman W. Franke nor...@myasd.com
wrote:
Will that work for a data model consisting of Object[]?
It'll work for any class, but of course only for properties, and Object[]
has only the class one (read-only). For anything not based on
properties, such
