Re: Re: [Taspetry IoC] Using Tapestry IoC with JavaFX

2010-05-26 Thread Antoine Mischler
wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your answers. I tried with Taspestry 5.2.0 but I still get the > problem. After some investigations it looks like that the unrecognized > methods are not synthetic. Actually, every JavaFX object extends the > com.sun.javafx.runtime.FXBase cl

Re: Re: [Taspetry IoC] Using Tapestry IoC with JavaFX

2010-05-26 Thread Antoine Mischler
Hi, Thanks for your answers. I tried with Taspestry 5.2.0 but I still get the problem. After some investigations it looks like that the unrecognized methods are not synthetic. Actually, every JavaFX object extends the com.sun.javafx.runtime.FXBase class bringing those unrecognized methods. So the

Antwort: Re: [Taspetry IoC] Using Tapestry IoC with JavaFX

2010-05-26 Thread Kristian Marinkovic
hi, there was a issue that already has been fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-839 g, kris Von:"Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" An: "Tapestry users" Datum: 25.05.2010 15:06 Betreff:Re: [Taspetry IoC] Using Tapestry IoC with JavaFX On Tu

Re: [Taspetry IoC] Using Tapestry IoC with JavaFX

2010-05-25 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Tue, 25 May 2010 08:50:45 -0300, Antoine Mischler wrote: Hi guys, Hi! followed by a bunch of unrecognized methods. I think these methods are automatically generated by the javafx compiler. So my question is: is there a way to make the registry less sensible to unrecognized methods

[Taspetry IoC] Using Tapestry IoC with JavaFX

2010-05-25 Thread Antoine Mischler
Hi guys, I've been working happily with Tapestry IoC in the past, and now I'm trying to use it with JavaFX. Actually, annotations are not supported in JavaFX but I thought it should be possible to use it by building the registry manually and getting the services explicitly. So I wrote

Re: t5: Using Tapestry5 with JavaFx

2009-07-20 Thread 王刚
Yes. JavaFX is a Java RIA(Rich Internet Application) solution compared with Adobe flash, and Microsoft silverlight. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > Probably not; to Tapestry, JavaFX looks like any other applet however. > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:07 PM, An

Re: t5: Using Tapestry5 with JavaFx

2009-07-14 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Probably not; to Tapestry, JavaFX looks like any other applet however. On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Angelo Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > anybody has done this? > > Angelo > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/t5%3A-Using-Tapestry5-with-JavaFx-tp24

t5: Using Tapestry5 with JavaFx

2009-07-14 Thread Angelo Chen
Hi, anybody has done this? Angelo -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/t5%3A-Using-Tapestry5-with-JavaFx-tp24489896p24489896.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To

Re: JavaFX

2007-05-10 Thread Robin Ericsson
On 5/10/07, Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oh, wait a minute...here's a possible purpose: You HAVE to use NetBeans to develop it! (At least for now). No, there is an Eclipse plugin available. -- regards, Robin -

Re: JavaFX

2007-05-10 Thread Bill Holloway
Oh, wait a minute...here's a possible purpose: You HAVE to use NetBeans to develop it! (At least for now). On 5/9/07, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yeah, JavaFX looks really weird and purposeless. --- Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'

Re: JavaFX

2007-05-09 Thread Konstantin Ignatyev
Yeah, JavaFX looks really weird and purposeless. --- Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've looked at sample code for JavaFX and it reminds > me *greatly* of > all the IDE-generated stuff when I do Swing > applications in Eclipse or > netbeans. God help

Re: JavaFX

2007-05-09 Thread Bill Holloway
I've looked at sample code for JavaFX and it reminds me *greatly* of all the IDE-generated stuff when I do Swing applications in Eclipse or netbeans. God help us generating UI's by hand with this stuff! bill On 5/8/07, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes..quite. T

Re: JavaFX

2007-05-08 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Yes..quite. There's a related article. http://beust.com/weblog/archives/000446.html On 5/8/07, Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: See the article, http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3676226. Slashdotted too. Interesting stuff. Bill -- "The future is here. It's just not

JavaFX

2007-05-08 Thread Bill Holloway
See the article, http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3676226. Slashdotted too. Interesting stuff. Bill -- "The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet." -- Traditional - To unsubscribe, e-mail: