wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your answers. I tried with Taspestry 5.2.0 but I still get the
> problem. After some investigations it looks like that the unrecognized
> methods are not synthetic. Actually, every JavaFX object extends the
> com.sun.javafx.runtime.FXBase cl
Hi,
Thanks for your answers. I tried with Taspestry 5.2.0 but I still get the
problem. After some investigations it looks like that the unrecognized
methods are not synthetic. Actually, every JavaFX object extends the
com.sun.javafx.runtime.FXBase class bringing those unrecognized methods. So
the
hi,
there was a issue that already has been fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-839
g,
kris
Von:"Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo"
An: "Tapestry users"
Datum: 25.05.2010 15:06
Betreff:Re: [Taspetry IoC] Using Tapestry IoC with JavaFX
On Tu
On Tue, 25 May 2010 08:50:45 -0300, Antoine Mischler
wrote:
Hi guys,
Hi!
followed by a bunch of unrecognized methods. I think these methods are
automatically generated by the javafx compiler.
So my question is: is there a way to make the registry less sensible to
unrecognized methods
Hi guys,
I've been working happily with Tapestry IoC in the past, and now I'm trying
to use it with JavaFX. Actually, annotations are not supported in JavaFX but
I thought it should be possible to use it by building the registry manually
and getting the services explicitly. So I wrote
Yes. JavaFX is a Java RIA(Rich Internet Application) solution compared with
Adobe flash, and Microsoft silverlight.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Probably not; to Tapestry, JavaFX looks like any other applet however.
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:07 PM, An
Probably not; to Tapestry, JavaFX looks like any other applet however.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Angelo Chen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> anybody has done this?
>
> Angelo
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/t5%3A-Using-Tapestry5-with-JavaFx-tp24
Hi,
anybody has done this?
Angelo
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/t5%3A-Using-Tapestry5-with-JavaFx-tp24489896p24489896.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
On 5/10/07, Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, wait a minute...here's a possible purpose: You HAVE to use
NetBeans to develop it! (At least for now).
No, there is an Eclipse plugin available.
--
regards,
Robin
-
Oh, wait a minute...here's a possible purpose: You HAVE to use
NetBeans to develop it! (At least for now).
On 5/9/07, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, JavaFX looks really weird and purposeless.
--- Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'
Yeah, JavaFX looks really weird and purposeless.
--- Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've looked at sample code for JavaFX and it reminds
> me *greatly* of
> all the IDE-generated stuff when I do Swing
> applications in Eclipse or
> netbeans. God help
I've looked at sample code for JavaFX and it reminds me *greatly* of
all the IDE-generated stuff when I do Swing applications in Eclipse or
netbeans. God help us generating UI's by hand with this stuff!
bill
On 5/8/07, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes..quite.
T
Yes..quite.
There's a related article. http://beust.com/weblog/archives/000446.html
On 5/8/07, Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See the article,
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3676226. Slashdotted
too. Interesting stuff.
Bill
--
"The future is here. It's just not
See the article,
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3676226. Slashdotted
too. Interesting stuff.
Bill
--
"The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."
-- Traditional
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
14 matches
Mail list logo