Hi Jesse --
Thanks for your work on Tapestry. I have noticed an issue around memory
usage with our automated tests which extensively use hivemind. I was
wondering if anyone has investigated hivemind memory leaks. I am going to do
some further investigating as time permits after Tuesday. That
with a released version.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 7:45 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
This is my POM:
repositories
repository
releases
updatePolicyalways
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
This is my POM:
repositories
repository
releases
updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy
checksumPolicywarn/checksumPolicy
/releases
snapshots
updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy
checksumPolicyfail/checksumPolicy
repository
idapache.snapshots/id
freibleibend und unverbindlich.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 09:31
An: Tapestry users
Betreff: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
Correct me if I am wrong 4.1.2 is not released as yet
: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
Correct me if I am wrong 4.1.2 is not released as yet, and not in the main
repository, so how else would I get to it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that POM does use snapshots.
You shouldn't need the repository
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2
und Angebote per Mail
| sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet:
Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 09:31
An: Tapestry users
Betreff: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
Correct me if I am wrong 4.1.2
Peter,
though not officially final (I believe),
http://news247.gr (tap-4.1.2) has been getting 40 req/day
for an uptime of 26 days with memory set to no more than 128MB.
On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jessie
Any progress on this? sorry to bug you, but I
Andreas, give me a break! I am not trying to trash Tapestry if that's
what you are thinking. I am not the only one experiencing these problems.
Have a look at some of my postings (and others posts) and you will see
what I am talking about. I have been having these problems since
upgrading
On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas, give me a break! I am not trying to trash Tapestry if that's
what you are thinking. I am not the only one experiencing these problems.
Hey - i never meant that!
It's obvious from the reports that something's going on + Jesse
So changing the page pool parameters didn't help then?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 10:34 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
Andreas, give me a break! I am
Now that's an OGNL compiler error. Have you tried with OGNL
2.7.1-SNAPSHOT(just use the latest). OGNL
2.7 that comes with Tap 4.1.2 by default is known to have bugs with the
compiled expressions. Please try with the latest OGNL; it might just do the
trick.
Kalle
On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides
No Marcus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So changing the page pool parameters didn't help then?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 10:34 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
Hi Jessie
I'm gonna try update my version of ognl, if that won't work I will
downgrade. I have not filed any bugs yet, but I sent a couple of emails
to the list. I don't get any exceptions during development, but that is
because its not running for 3 or 4 days. I strongly suggest you
Umm yeah. I have looked in to it as I just said.
The only thing left is for me to look at this youkit snapshot profile
and play from there but I'm not capable of debugging issues that
aren't reported properly.
On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jessie
I'm gonna try
my configuration is as follows:
JDK 6.01 32bit JVM (I have also tested on a 64 bit with no
luck) Tomcat 5.5.20 Debian Linux (2.6.15.28 kernel) Tapestry
4.1.2-SNAPSHOT with ognl 2.7
Hi Peter, 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT is a typo, I suppose?
regards,
Peter
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
I'd downgrade
Yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my configuration is as follows:
JDK 6.01 32bit JVM (I have also tested on a 64 bit with no
luck) Tomcat 5.5.20 Debian Linux (2.6.15.28 kernel) Tapestry
4.1.2-SNAPSHOT with ognl 2.7
Hi Peter, 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT is a typo, I suppose?
regards,
Peter
This is my POM:
repositories
repository
releases
updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy
checksumPolicywarn/checksumPolicy
/releases
snapshots
updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy
checksumPolicyfail/checksumPolicy
repository
idapache.snapshots/id
urlhttp://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/url
Hi Jessie
Any progress on this? sorry to bug you, but I have to take a
decision soon, I have two production machines that will need to upgrade
or downgrade Tapestry.
Best wishes,
Peter
Jon Oakes wrote:
Hi Bryan,
I am a relative newbie but I was wondering if you are running with
I and another colleague of mine have been investigating what seems to be
a memory leak in our Tapestry application for about a month since we
upgraded to T4.1.2. I won't bore you with the saga of the last month,
but I would like to present the data I've gathered and look to the list
for a
Hmmm...well, I don't think I like the sound of any of that. I'm just
going to pretend this problem doesn't exist. (just kidding)
I had thought I was doing something special with the ognl compilations
that would cause its generated classes to not hang around afterwards
in any pools.
I'll take
20 matches
Mail list logo
