Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-02-18 Thread George Christman
by the way this is a 5.4 bug starting in beta-26, beta-25 it works fine. I'm not sure about 5.3 as I no longer use it. On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:40 PM, George Christman wrote: > It's the same behavior regardless of whether or not your using ajax. I > thought initially it was an ajax only excepti

Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-02-18 Thread George Christman
It's the same behavior regardless of whether or not your using ajax. I thought initially it was an ajax only exception, but it's not. On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:12:21 -0200, George Christman < > gchrist...@ca

Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-02-18 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:12:21 -0200, George Christman wrote: I can finally replicate the bug so it can be fixed :) Thanks! Okay when you have a form loop with formstate="iteration" and there is a serverside validation error, the last row's textfield value becomes the first row's textfield

Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-02-18 Thread George Christman
I can finally replicate the bug so it can be fixed :) Okay when you have a form loop with formstate="iteration" and there is a serverside validation error, the last row's textfield value becomes the first row's textfield value. Code to replicate bug. Price

Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-02-17 Thread George Christman
On Feb 17, 2015 8:26 PM, "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo" wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:56:00 -0200, George Christman < gchrist...@cardaddy.com> wrote: > >> Thiago, could you please reopen this issue again. > > > Done. Thanks > > >> We are experiencing an >> issue where 1 field continues to lose

Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-02-17 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:56:00 -0200, George Christman wrote: Thiago, could you please reopen this issue again. Done. We are experiencing an issue where 1 field continues to lose it's value on validation. Could you please provide the code and template you're using that reproduces this?

Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-02-17 Thread George Christman
Thiago, could you please reopen this issue again. We are experiencing an issue where 1 field continues to lose it's value on validation. This issue started in beta-26 completely breaking everything when we had an ajax validation error but worked perfectly fine in 25. In beta-27 it appeared to fix m

Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-01-15 Thread George Christman
Thanks On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:49:36 -0200, George Christman > wrote: > >> I just tried reopening issue TAP5-2391, however I don't think I have >> the proper permissions to do so. Could someone reopen the issue for >> me? I l

Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-01-15 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:49:36 -0200, George Christman wrote: I just tried reopening issue TAP5-2391, however I don't think I have the proper permissions to do so. Could someone reopen the issue for me? I left a comment on the issue in regards to this new bug. Done. :) https://issues.apach

Re: Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-01-15 Thread George Christman
I just tried reopening issue TAP5-2391, however I don't think I have the proper permissions to do so. Could someone reopen the issue for me? I left a comment on the issue in regards to this new bug. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2391 On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:39 PM, George Christman

Newly introduced validation bug 5.4-beta-26

2015-01-14 Thread George Christman
Hi, after upgrading from beta-25 to beta-26 I've discovered my form fields are being cleared after an ajax form submission occurs with a returned validation error. I think I read something about Howard changing some things with the validation, so I'm wondering if that might be the cause of this is