Hi Jesse --
Thanks for your work on Tapestry. I have noticed an issue around memory
usage with our automated tests which extensively use hivemind. I was
wondering if anyone has investigated hivemind memory leaks. I am going to do
some further investigating as time permits after Tuesday. That being
:45 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
This is my POM:
always
warn
always
fail
apache.snapshots
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository
org.apache.tapestry
tapestry-framework
4.1.2-SNAPSHOT
test
org.apache.tapestry
tapestry-annotat
ys go with a released version.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 7:45 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
>
> This is my POM:
>
>
>
This is my POM:
always
warn
always
fail
apache.snapshots
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository
org.apache.tapestry
tapestry-framework
4.1.2-SNAPSHOT
test
org.apache.tapestry
tapestry-annotations
4.1.2-SNAPSHOT
test
org.apache.tapestry
tapestry-contrib
4.1.2-SNAPSHOT
t
Yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my configuration is as follows:
JDK 6.01 32bit JVM (I have also tested on a 64 bit with no
luck) Tomcat 5.5.20 Debian Linux (2.6.15.28 kernel) Tapestry
4.1.2-SNAPSHOT with ognl 2.7
Hi Peter, 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT is a typo, I suppose?
regards,
Peter
Je
> my configuration is as follows:
>
> JDK 6.01 32bit JVM (I have also tested on a 64 bit with no
> luck) Tomcat 5.5.20 Debian Linux (2.6.15.28 kernel) Tapestry
> 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT with ognl 2.7
>
Hi Peter, 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT is a typo, I suppose?
> regards,
> Peter
>
> Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > I'
Umm yeah. I have looked in to it as I just said.
The only thing left is for me to look at this youkit snapshot profile
and play from there but I'm not capable of debugging issues that
aren't reported properly.
On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jessie
>
> I'm gonna tr
Hi Jessie
I'm gonna try update my version of ognl, if that won't work I will
downgrade. I have not filed any bugs yet, but I sent a couple of emails
to the list. I don't get any exceptions during development, but that is
because its not running for 3 or 4 days. I strongly suggest you consider
I'd downgrade then if I were you. Extensive profiling with yourkit
hasn't shed any new light on whatever problems others are having.
The OGNL classes indeed aren't being kept in the javassist pool from
what I can tell.
I have another yourkit snapshot binary to look at so we'll see what that says
No Marcus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So changing the page pool parameters didn't help then?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 10:34 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard
On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Andreas, give me a break! I am not trying to trash Tapestry if that's
> what you are thinking. I am not the only one experiencing these problems.
Hey - i never meant that!
It's obvious from the reports that something's going on + Jes
So changing the page pool parameters didn't help then?
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 10:34 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
>
>
> A
Now that's an OGNL compiler error. Have you tried with OGNL
2.7.1-SNAPSHOT(just use the latest). OGNL
2.7 that comes with Tap 4.1.2 by default is known to have bugs with the
compiled expressions. Please try with the latest OGNL; it might just do the
trick.
Kalle
On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides <[E
Andreas, give me a break! I am not trying to trash Tapestry if that's
what you are thinking. I am not the only one experiencing these problems.
Have a look at some of my postings (and others posts) and you will see
what I am talking about. I have been having these problems since
upgrading from
Peter,
though not officially final (I believe),
http://news247.gr (tap-4.1.2) has been getting 40 req/day
for an uptime of 26 days with memory set to no more than 128MB.
On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jessie
>
> Any progress on this? sorry to bug you, but
Hi Jessie
Any progress on this? sorry to bug you, but I have to take a
decision soon, I have two production machines that will need to upgrade
or downgrade Tapestry.
Best wishes,
Peter
Jon Oakes wrote:
Hi Bryan,
I am a relative newbie but I was wondering if you are running with
cach
Hi Bryan,
I am a relative newbie but I was wondering if you are running with
caching enabled or disabled? It might make sense to keep things around
when caching is disabled whereas I think it would clearly be a bug to
keep things around with it disabled.
Jon Oakes
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
Hmmm...well, I don't think I like the sound of any of that. I'm just
going to pretend this problem doesn't exist. (just kidding)
I had thought I was doing something special with the ognl compilations
that would cause its generated classes to not hang around afterwards
in any pools.
I'll take
18 matches
Mail list logo
