On Jan 9, 2008 7:06 PM, Franz Amador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops, you're right. I am using tapestry5-acegi-example, and I'd forgotten
> that it has me define the entities. I was thinking that they were being
> defined internally to tapestry5-acegi. I know enough of Hibernate to proceed
n Helgelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 1:14:37 AM
Subject: Re: T5: Acegi table name too long for Oracle 9i
On Jan 9, 2008 12:38 AM, Franz Amador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, it's not my table. I presume it's being de
On Jan 9, 2008 12:38 AM, Franz Amador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, it's not my table. I presume it's being defined by
> tapestry5-acegi, which is why I posted it here.
It seems you are using the tapestry5-acegi-example? This example is
using Hibernate the easiest way it can, it also us
Actually, it's not my table. I presume it's being defined by tapestry5-acegi,
which is why I posted it here.
- Original Message
From: Daniel Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2008 3:03:11 PM
Subject: Re: T5: Acegi table name too lo
This seems more like Hibernate's problem. I'm not defending 9i's
failboating in
character limits. (What is this, 1994?)
I haven't played with this module, but perhaps you can specify the
name of the table in an annotation (if you are using Hibernate
Annotations) or in an XML file? Just specify a
I'm using the tapestry5-acegi module (v 1.0.2, Tapestry v 5.0.7), and I get an
error when Hibernate tries to create tables in Oracle 9i:
14:09:42.234 ERROR! [main]
org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaUpdate.execute(SchemaUpdate.java:155) >55>
Unsuccessful: create table UserDetailsBean_GrantedAutho
