Thanks Thiago/Robert!
Both of your suggestions worked (although I had to change the method
to public instead of protected for both). I didn't try Norman's
(although I'm sure OGNL would be fine) because I'm not using CK (at
least not yet).
mrg
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Robert Zeigler wro
If you want the method to be showFoo(), then you need to do
test="showFoo()".
But you can use test="showFoo" if showFoo() is renamed to isShowFoo,
iff you change the accessor to public (from protected).
That is, for property access, tapestry is following java beans
conventions, and a property
On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
Em Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:34:01 -0300, Michael Gentry > escreveu:
Hi all,
Hi!
...
Try Notice the
parenthesis. Without them, Tapestry looks for get or is methods.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java con
Em Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:34:01 -0300, Michael Gentry
escreveu:
Hi all,
Hi!
...
Try Notice the parenthesis.
Without them, Tapestry looks for get or is methods.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thia
Hi all,
I've been searching the documentation/examples/list all morning, but
can't find an answer to this so far. Can T5.1 do a conditional
against a method instead of a variable (property)? I have something
like:
...
For the Java, I have tried numerous varieties of:
protected boolean showFoo
