On 10.08.2011 18:59, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> On 8/10/2011 8:12 AM, Alexander Diedler wrote:
>> my uriworkermap.properties /manager=worker1
>
> Mapped /manager
>
>> /manager/*=worker1 /docs=worker1 /*=worker1 /go/*=worker1
>> /go=worker1 /show/*=worker1
>
>> # Mapping all UR
> We use apache http in-front of tomcat. This allows us to do exactly this. We
> route calls from apache through to tomcat normally using mod_jk, and then
> when we want to perform an upgrade, we update apache config, graceful
> restart of apache, and apache routes all traffic to holding page. This
- Original Message -
> From: Bill Davidson
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 1:59 PM
> Subject: "-d64" disappears from command line in "ps" output?
>
> RedHat 5.6 64-bit
> "java -version" output:
> java version "1.6.0_20"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Env
>>> I want to use parallel deployment as an easy way to allow existing
> >>> sessions to continue while redirecting new sessions to a "down for
> >>> temp maintenance page."
>
We use apache http in-front of tomcat. This allows us to do exactly this. We
route calls from apache through to tomcat no
On 8/10/2011 2:57 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
1) In what way does this concern Tomcat?
I wasn't sure if it had something to do with the way it was launched.
2) Documentation for -d64 with a standard launcher seems to indicate it's only
applicable for Solaris (although some other tools lo
- Original Message -
> From: Dante Bell
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Cc: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:26 AM
> Subject: Re: TC 6.0.20 Cleanup after application crash
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I did indeed read and digest Mark's email and talked to the vendor about
> t
> From: Bill Davidson [mailto:bill...@gmail.com]
> Subject: "-d64" disappears from command line in "ps" output?
> RedHat 5.6 64-bit
> "java -version" output:
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode)
> Tomcat: 6.0.26
> The "-d64" option seems to be removed from the "ps"
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave,
On 8/8/2011 8:46 AM, Dave Filchak wrote:
> I had to switch hosts and one of the sites that I inherited is a
> tomcat site. After the move most of the site is fine but on a number
> of links, I get the following error:
>
> Error reading properti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 8/9/2011 3:08 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> tomcat docs for connectors say:
>
> scheme: This sets the protocol name as accessed by the
> ServletRequest.getScheme method. The scheme defaults to http.
>
> Is there any other way scheme can be c
RedHat 5.6 64-bit
"java -version" output:
java version "1.6.0_20"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode)
Tomcat: 6.0.26
The "-d64" option seems to be removed from the "ps" command line arguments:
I added a "
On 10/08/2011 21:15, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>>> I want to use parallel deployment as an easy way to allow existing
>>> sessions to continue while redirecting new sessions to a "down for
>>> temp maintenance page."
>
>> Why not just upload a new .war (with the newest version) which only
>> displ
>> I want to use parallel deployment as an easy way to allow existing
>> sessions to continue while redirecting new sessions to a "down for
>> temp maintenance page."
> Why not just upload a new .war (with the newest version) which only
> displays that page?
I could do that. But if I can use the
On 10/08/2011 19:55, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> Quick answer: I want to have my Grails app determine at runtime which
> version it was deployed as (bad English, I know).
>
> Longer answer:
>
> I want to use parallel deployment as an easy way to allow existing
> sessions to continue while redirec
On 10/08/2011 19:26, Dante Bell wrote:
> after 15 minutes it starts serving up db responses!
Sounds a bit like an OutOfMemoryError, which is not uncommon during load
tests.
If the 'customised' load tester is a bit rough around edges, what are
you really testing?
p
-
I suspect I can do it like this:
"If session information is present in the request, check the session
manager of each version for a matching session and if one is found,
use that version."
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder & Executive Director
Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary
http://www.tabbysplace.org
Quick answer: I want to have my Grails app determine at runtime which
version it was deployed as (bad English, I know).
Longer answer:
I want to use parallel deployment as an easy way to allow existing
sessions to continue while redirecting new sessions to a "down for
temp maintenance page."
My
On 10/08/2011 19:41, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> Looking at some of my session ids & doing some searching online did
> not turn up any useful info on format of session id (& where context
> version is).
>
> Can you point me at something?
Sorry, my bad - that was an earlier version of the code tha
Looking at some of my session ids & doing some searching online did
not turn up any useful info on format of session id (& where context
version is).
Can you point me at something?
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder & Executive Director
Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary
http://www.tabbysplace.org/
On W
Hi Chris,
I did indeed read and digest Mark's email and talked to the vendor about
that issue. The stack trace on the old blog post is from the one Mark
was helping out with (man, that was a really bad sentance!).
This is a different issue :( I don't have a stack trace and I don't have
access to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander,
On 8/10/2011 8:12 AM, Alexander Diedler wrote:
> my uriworkermap.properties /manager=worker1
Mapped /manager
> /manager/*=worker1 /docs=worker1 /*=worker1 /go/*=worker1
> /go=worker1 /show/*=worker1
>
> # Mapping all URI which end with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dante,
On 8/10/2011 11:57 AM, Dante Bell wrote:
> We are seeing that after an application crash (customized load
> tester with minimal error handling so it crashes often)
When you say "crash", do you mean you get a stack trace in the logs and
Tomcat
On 10/08/2011 17:37, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> I'm using Tomcat 7+. How can I get the context version #? I.e., if app Is
> being run as app##124, I want 124.
The simplest way will be to parse the session ID.
Mark
-
To unsub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
On 8/9/2011 4:49 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 09.08.2011 20:45, Lataxes, Karl wrote:
>> Our clients cannot send or process JSESSIONIDs as they are not web
>> browsers, but proprietary equipment running embedded software that
>> sends HTTP POS
I'm using Tomcat 7+. How can I get the context version #? I.e., if app Is
being run as app##124, I want 124.
--
JR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sodastream,
On 8/9/2011 3:52 PM, sodastream wrote:
> The app handles its own authentication via a conventional
> username/password form on a login page. I wanted to add a second
> factor to the authentication without modifying the app (except for
> it
YES, this works! I have to define the virtual host in die
uriworkermap.properties.
Best regards
Alexander Diedler
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. August 2011 16:03
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: Re: AW: Multiple Tomcat Server
Erratum: I meant in the section "Virtual host integration - IIS"
André Warnier wrote:
Apart from the stuff below, it looks as if you'll have to use (for
uriworkermap.properties), the form that is mentioned here :
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/uriworkermap.html
in the sectio
Apart from the stuff below, it looks as if you'll have to use (for
uriworkermap.properties), the form that is mentioned here :
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/uriworkermap.html
in the section "IIS"
(at least if I understand correctly what you are trying to do, and how this
wo
There is something else wrong in your server.xml.
It is not the cause of the problem, but it is confusing, so it's better to correct these
issues right now.
I)
> Server.xml from TC 6.0
>
>
>
>
>SiteA.xxx.de
a) If in the Engine, you have : defaultHost="localhost"
then you should
Sorry, One mistake in the server.xml conf below, I correct them.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alexander Diedler
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. August 2011 14:10
An: 'Tomcat Users List'; 'Tomcat Users List'
Betreff: AW: Multiple Tomcat Servers connect to IIS
Hello,
Yes, but we do not map singl
Hello,
Yes, but we do not map single Apps like /app1 /app2 ,,.. every App has it
own Host in server.xml and conf/Catalina
My new Worker.properties:
worker.list=worker1,worker2
#Tomcat 6.0.32
worker.worker1.host=localhost
worker.worker1.port=8009
worker.worker1.type=ajp13
#Tomcat 7.0.19
worker.wo
The Apache Tomcat team announces that support for Apache Tomcat 5.5.x
will end on 30 September 2012.
This means that after 30 September 2012:
- releases from the 5.5.x branch are highly unlikely
- bugs affecting only the 5.5.x branch will not be addressed
- security vulnerability reports will not
Alexander Diedler wrote:
Hello,
I know the way to conenct a single Tomcat to an IIS in Windows 2003 with
isapi_redirect.dll, worker.properties and uriworkermap.properties. But, how
we can connect two different Tomcats (e.g. Tomcat 6.0.32 and 7.0.19) to
Websites in the same IIS ?
For isapi_re
Hello,
I know the way to conenct a single Tomcat to an IIS in Windows 2003 with
isapi_redirect.dll, worker.properties and uriworkermap.properties. But, how
we can connect two different Tomcats (e.g. Tomcat 6.0.32 and 7.0.19) to
Websites in the same IIS ?
Best regards
Alexander
smime.p7s
34 matches
Mail list logo
