Re: Tomcat 7.0.67 vs. 7.0.62: any reason why 67 might be slower?

2017-02-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 James, On 2/1/17 3:59 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote: > This is a long-shot, but . . . > > One of our customer installations is running slow, for no apparent > reason. For example, a very simple BIRT report running in our > webapp takes 6 seconds

Tomcat 7.0.67 vs. 7.0.62: any reason why 67 might be slower?

2017-02-01 Thread James H. H. Lampert
This is a long-shot, but . . . One of our customer installations is running slow, for no apparent reason. For example, a very simple BIRT report running in our webapp takes 6 seconds to run in this installation, whereas an essentially identical one takes only one second on another customer's

Re: TomcatCon @ ApacheCon

2017-02-01 Thread Coty Sutherland
I'm still planning to submit for the linux packaging talk (though I haven't heard anything else form the other distro maintainers), just haven't done it yet. I suppose I could volunteer for one of the others, I'll check the list. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Mark Thomas

Re: TomcatCon @ ApacheCon

2017-02-01 Thread Mark Thomas
On 01/02/2017 19:09, Christopher Schultz wrote: > All, > > On 1/17/17 5:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 09/01/2017 11:57, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> > >>> I look forward to hearing your topic ideas. > >> Thanks for all the great ideas so far. I've tried to pull them all >> together here: >>

Re: TomcatCon @ ApacheCon

2017-02-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, On 1/17/17 5:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 09/01/2017 11:57, Mark Thomas wrote: > > > >> I look forward to hearing your topic ideas. > > Thanks for all the great ideas so far. I've tried to pull them all > together here: >

Re: Question about catalina.out log entries, particularly from VersionLoggerListener

2017-02-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 James, On 1/31/17 8:48 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote: > On 1/31/17, 2:32 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> But what about the "JVM Version" entry? >> >> That comes directly from the "java.runtime.version" system >> property, which I believe is