> From: Jäkel, Guido [mailto:g.jae...@dnb.de]
> Subject: RE: Contexts: can there be a hierarchy?
> why do you call it not really a hierachy? If you name the deployments e.g.
> ROOT.war
> foo.war
> foo#bar.war
> then the "expected" will happen: The longest context path will
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018, 2:06 AM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Bab,
>
> On 8/22/18 9:49 AM, Bab Alemzadeh wrote:
> > I am using Windows Server 2008/2012, datacenter edition. We have
> > installed: KB4338815.
> >
> >
Dear Chales (and James)
why do you call it not really a hierachy? If you name the deployments e.g.
ROOT.war
foo.war
foo#bar.war
then the "expected" will happen: The longest context path will match to the
corresponding container:
* all /foo/bar{,/.*} will be served by
On 22/08/18 19:48, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
> Back on topic, do JSPs have to be registered with the container using
> servlet mappings in web.xml or some other mechanism in order to serve as
> targets of forwards by servlets? Further, does doing so make those JSPs
> accessible via external