Re: mod_proxy_ajp equivalent for JK_LB_ACTIVATION?

2020-04-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, Maybe I can earn myself a beer. >> On 3/6/20 13:44, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> no, the status unfortunately is not available as an Apache env >>> var. > >>> mod_proxy_ajp has a builtin provision for automatic env var >>> forwarding: alle env vars

RE: 2 questions

2020-04-10 Thread jonmcalexander
Thank you SO Very much Mark and Chris!!! Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire Jon McAlexander Asst Vice President Middleware Product Engineering Enterprise CIO | Platform Services | Middleware | Infrastructure Solutions 8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322 MAC: F4469-010 Tel 515-988-2508 |

Re: mod_proxy_ajp equivalent for JK_LB_ACTIVATION?

2020-04-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64338 For anyone who likes beer. Or whatever you like to drink (within reason) . - -chris On 3/9/20 17:44, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Rainer, > > On 3/6/20 13:44, Rainer Jung wrote: >> Hi

Re: Alternatives for AJP

2020-04-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 David, On 4/10/20 11:45, David Cleary wrote: > Some of our customers are currently using the AJP connector. Given > the vulnerability and breaking change to address it, now may be a > good time to prompt them look at alternatives. One requirement

Alternatives for AJP

2020-04-10 Thread David Cleary
Some of our customers are currently using the AJP connector. Given the vulnerability and breaking change to address it, now may be a good time to prompt them look at alternatives. One requirement is HTTPS support. What are the alternatives when hosting Tomcat behind Apache httpd, nginx, or IIS?

Re: 2 questions

2020-04-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Jon, On 4/9/20 18:45, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > Potentially off-topic, sorta, questions.> Asking here as it has to > do with connecting to Tomcat. :) Nope, this is the right place. mod_jk is a Tomcat project, not a part of