Re: tomcat connection pool per database (postgres)

On 24/11/2020 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > On 11/24/20 8:52 AM, Rob Sargent wrote: >> Perhaps I read too much into the description of "The tomcat JDBC >> Connection Pool" page? >> >> TheJDBC Connection Pool|org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool|is a replacement >> or an alternative to theApache Commons

[ANN] Apache Tomcat 7.0.107 released

The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 7.0.107. Apache Tomcat is an open source software implementation of the Java Servlet, JavaServer Pages, Java Expression Language and Java WebSocket technologies. This release contains a number of bug fixes and

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Can Tomcat 9 be FIPS compliant without OpenSSL?

Avik, Did you happen to try out the steps in README https://github.com/amitlpande/tomcat-9-fips here? I am looking for feedback from the community before I could add these steps (and some more) on Tomcat Security FAQ page. So, really appreciate your (and others') feedback. The steps above

Re: tomcat connection pool per database (postgres)

On 11/24/20 8:52 AM, Rob Sargent wrote: Perhaps I read too much into the description of "The tomcat JDBC Connection Pool" page? TheJDBC Connection Pool|org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool|is a replacement or an alternative to theApache Commons DBCP connection

Bouncy Castle FIPS on RHEL 7.3

Probably not directly related to Tomcat but still sharing. Advanced apologies for that. I am using bouncy castle FIPS library and observed that specifically on RHEL 7.3, the library usage is causing tremendous slowness. e.g. below key tool command taking several minutes to finish. keytool

Re: tomcat connection pool per database (postgres)

Perhaps I read too much into the description of "The tomcat JDBC Connection Pool" page? TheJDBC Connection Pool|org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool|is a replacement or an alternative to theApache Commons DBCP connection pool. I reacted to the "replacement" bit. Are

Re: tomcat connection pool per database (postgres)

On 11/24/20 8:14 AM, Rob Sargent wrote: Thanks. I get it. But... - seems this solution raises the footprint of the pooler, with number-of-users * minimum-connection-count etc - would it be beyond the pale for the pooler to maintain username-connectionList maps? Per response elsethread,

Re: tomcat connection pool per database (postgres)

Thanks.  I get it. But... - seems this solution raises the footprint of the pooler, with number-of-users * minimum-connection-count etc - would it be beyond the pale for the pooler to maintain username-connectionList maps? Thankfully, I'll be wildly successful if I have two concurrent

Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?

On 24/11/2020 14:11, Christopher Schultz wrote: > On 11/20/20 11:08, Mark Thomas wrote: >> A second look at the strace file from yesterday provided hard evidence >> of a native library mis-using file descriptors and strong circumstantial >> evidence linking that same library to a specific

RE: random 400 errors

Thank you! I will pass this on to the app team. Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com) From: Mark Thomas Sent: Nov 24, 2020 3:14 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: random 400 errors On 24/11/2020 04:04, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID

Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?

Mark, On 11/20/20 11:08, Mark Thomas wrote: On 20/11/2020 15:43, Eric Robinson wrote: From: Mark Thomas This information might turn out to be unnecessary. I have been re-looking at the previous logs and I think I have enough evidence to ID a root cause. I'll email off-list as I need to

Re: tomcat connection pool per database (postgres)

Rob, On 11/19/20 12:38, Rob Sargent wrote: Since the connection URL names a specific postgres database is it standard practice to have a pool per target database?  (Switching databases in postgres amounts to closing/opening a connection.) I generally consider a database connection pool to be

Re: random 400 errors

On 24/11/2020 04:04, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > *9. **If-None-Match: * > > W/"1898-1605014636000"-gzip That etag is not valid. It should be: W/"1898-1605014636000-gzip" Do you know what component is generating that? A compression filter maybe? I did wonder if it was