We finally tracked down why a 3rd party application we use stopped working as
of our upgrade to 7.0.14 (and subsequent) - it was the fix applied to 7.0.12
which stopped unpacking WARs that were deployed from an appBase outside that of
the container. It presented itself in an odd way, which is w
code in tomcat that initially parses the
resource (in GlobalResources) and then instantiates the resources (I assume the
actual instantiation is via org.apache.naming.factory.ResourceFactory, but
don't know the code path leading towards that invocation).
We're seeing this on Tomcat 7.0.
o.home}
I've also thought about a custom listener or similar that would load before the
context-params are read and set the context-param value by reading a system
property set via catalina.properties.
Thanks!
--Jason Pringle
This message and the information contained herein is propr
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:02 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Typical setting for
>
> On 15/03/2011 06:06, Jason Pringle wrote:
> > Clearly what is there is correct, since it
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 10:14 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Typical setting for
>
> You can call it DefaultHost if you like. The only requirement is that
> the defaultHost specified in the Engine must be the name of a Host
> elemen
(as there will be a hardware loadbalancer and no
sessions).
Thanks!
Jason Pringle
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 1:59 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Is it possible for a web application to populate the
> global JNDI namespace?
>
> On 02/02/2011 20:47, Jason Prin
Can a web application populate the global JNDI namespace?
I am looking for a possible workaround to create shared connection pools
without modifying server.xml (ie placing entries in ).
If a web application could populate into the global namespace, then I could
devise a WAR which defined the d
> -Original Message-
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 3:08 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: tomcat datasource definitions - shared vs individual
>
> > From: Jason Pringle [mailto:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/context.html says "Any nested
elements, e.g. elements, that are defined in a default Context will
be created once for each Context to which the default applies. They will not be
shared between Context elements."
Default contexts:
$CATALINA_BASE/c
are planning to run our own suite of tests, but any inputs are extremely
helpful :)
---
Jason Pringle
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email
Chris,
On 9/24/2010 7:24 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> What issues are you thinking of, specifically. These?
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/jdbc-pool.html
Googling around shows many complaints about multithreaded behavior and
connection dropping.
Which (to me) suggests at leas
On 09/23/2010 2:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Several release attempts have failed due to a lack of interest.
Lack of interest by whom? The development team or the tomcat community?
> That said, $work is using this as the default pool in a commercial
> product based on Tomcat with minimal issue
hem? Could they be implemented within the interceptor
framework?
5) What are the implications for using with RAC?
6) What are the implications for using with FSF (Fast Start Failover)?
7) What are the implications for using within and XA environment (though
we work hard to avoid X
14 matches
Mail list logo
