om: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 6:30 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help Linking Static Content In a WebApp before and after (6.0.30.x)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russel,
On 6/6/12 8:45 AM, Morgan, Russel wrote:
Again
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:49 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help Linking Static Content In a WebApp before and after (6.0.30.x)
2012/6/6 Morgan, Russel :
>
> What I don't know h
@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help Linking Static Content In a WebApp before and after (6.0.30.x)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russel,
On 6/5/12 8:38 PM, Morgan, Russel wrote:
> I was initially pretty excited about
Russel Morgan
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 1:05 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help Linking Static Content In a WebApp before and after (6.0.30.x)
2012/6/5 Morgan, Russel :
> Thanks yes that is the chang
Morgan, Russel :
> Thanks yes that is the change that caused this issue with how we use static
> content.
>
> I am not sure how I mangled my formatting but I went through and cleaned it
> up, I hope that helps readability.
>
> Russ
>
>
>
Thanks yes that is the change that caused this issue with how we use static
content.
I am not sure how I mangled my formatting but I went through and cleaned it up,
I hope that helps readability.
Russ
Issue formatting recap below:
=
Tomcat Users:
Has anyone found a gr
Tomcat Users:
Has anyone found a graceful way to handle static content linking that works=
both pre and post the the following change?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50026
We have quite a few customers on earlier versions of Tomcat 6 as well as ne= w
customers pickin
