Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

2006-12-08 Thread dfelicia
>Tomcat currently does not support encryption. Huh? Sure it does. I think you mean AJP doesn't support encryption. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possibe---mod_jk-%3C%3D%3DSSL%3D%3D%3E-AJP-1.3-tf2776640.html#a7769280 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list arch

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

2006-12-08 Thread dfelicia
>Not true; see Interesting. I'll need to look into mod_proxy, further. But what about performance? I've not tested it in a long while, but last I tried it was slower that mod_jk. BTW, does Apache 2.2's new mod_proxy_ajp support en

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

2006-12-07 Thread dfelicia
>As far as have seen there is no SSL support for AJP/1.3 - the trafic is in clear between the Apache and tomcat using >mod_jk. > >I guess with apache 2 you can use mod_proxy and ssl to a tomcat using the http connector with ssl. Thanks for the reply, Fred. I feared that was the answer. The prob

Is this possibe? mod_jk <==SSL==> AJP/1.3

2006-12-07 Thread dfelicia
Can traffic between mod_jk and Tomcat's AJP connector be encrypted (without using ssh/stunnel)? I see SSL mentioned in the doc for AJP, but it's clear as mud: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/ajp.html So, in Apache, I am using SSL and mod_jk. I set these parameters per the mod_jk