On 18/10/2010 23:20, Simon Funnell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to know if it was worth using the sendfile features for small
> static files or is the APR already optimised for serving static content?
>
> I basically have a jsp that makes a choice between serving up a static
> (.html) and custom ver
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:05:42 +0100, Simon Funnell
wrote:
I guess my question is, if I use
instead of sendfile, is their any difference?
I figure that if I have lots of unauthenticated users this will help
with maintaining the load.
I'm afraid, that processing of directive is so
expensive
Hi,
I wanted to know if it was worth using the sendfile features for small
static files or is the APR already optimised for serving static content?
I basically have a jsp that makes a choice between serving up a static
(.html) and custom version of the page dependant on whether the user is
a
Hi,
I wanted to know if it was worth using the sendfile features for small
static files or is the APR already optimised for serving static content?
I basically have a jsp that makes a choice between serving up a static
(.html) and custom version of the page dependant on whether the user is
a
