Thanks Mark and Christopher
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Murthy,
>
> On 10/3/17 7:38 AM, s v n trimurthulu wrote:
> > At present we are using 7.0.x in our production environment.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Murthy,
On 10/3/17 7:38 AM, s v n trimurthulu wrote:
> At present we are using 7.0.x in our production environment. As we
> have received few CVE alerts we wanted to migrate it to latest
> version 9.0.x. But when i see the status of the 9.0.x releas
On 03/10/17 12:38, s v n trimurthulu wrote:
> Hello There,
>
> At present we are using 7.0.x in our production environment. As we have
> received few CVE alerts we wanted to migrate it to latest version 9.0.x.
I'm not sure if you look at the vulnerability data for the last 12
months that the evid
Hello There,
At present we are using 7.0.x in our production environment. As we have
received few CVE alerts we wanted to migrate it to latest version 9.0.x.
But when i see the status of the 9.0.x release it is showing "Stable = No".
So i request you to suggest me whether i can use the latest ver