On 1/17/06, Chris Mooring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I have just read various configuration documents for jk2 and jk. It seems as > though support for jk2 is no longer available. > Is jk the recommended connector to use now? It seems odd...like I am using a > previous version. > > Also, I'd still love to hear from anyone about my previous question on > whether Tomcat's native HTTP server is a better option than using a setup > such as IIS or Apache and a connector like JK. See my previous e-mail pasted > below; > > Thanks, > Chris > > Previous question on performance of Tomcat native HTTP server vs Apache/IIS > and connectors. > > Hi All, > > I am trying to determine which will deliver better performance; > 1) Tomcat's Native HTTP server > > 2) IIS or Apache with JK2 connectors
If you have only one server, 1 will be faster and easier to maintain in almost all situations (proxying, even with a fairly optimized protocol like AJP, is quite expensive). -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Rémy Maucherat Developer & Consultant JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
