Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Martin, On 4/30/20 05:02, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM Mark Thomas > wrote: > >> On 29/04/2020 18:11, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> Mark, >>> >>> On 4/28/20 13:33, Mark Thomas wrote: On 28/04/2020 16:30, S

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 4/30/20 04:15, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 29/04/2020 18:11, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> Mark, >> >> On 4/28/20 13:33, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 28/04/2020 16:30, Satya Kishore Thumu wrote: Hi Chris, Post the Ghostcat changes tomcat now

RE: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-30 Thread Satya Kishore Thumu
s resolution of localhost as well. Kishore -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 2:47 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue with AJP listener On 30/04/2020 10:02, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM Mark T

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-30 Thread Mark Thomas
On 30/04/2020 10:02, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 29/04/2020 18:11, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> Mark, >>> >>> On 4/28/20 13:33, Mark Thomas wrote: On 28/04/2020 16:30, Satya Kishore Thumu wrote: > Hi Chris, Post the Ghos

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-30 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 29/04/2020 18:11, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > Mark, > > > > On 4/28/20 13:33, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 28/04/2020 16:30, Satya Kishore Thumu wrote: > >>> Hi Chris, Post the Ghostcat changes tomcat now listens only on > >>> ipv4 by

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-30 Thread Mark Thomas
On 29/04/2020 18:11, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mark, > > On 4/28/20 13:33, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 28/04/2020 16:30, Satya Kishore Thumu wrote: >>> Hi Chris, Post the Ghostcat changes tomcat now listens only on >>> ipv4 by default, what if somebody is using on IPv6, Tomcat starts >>> to listen

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-29 Thread Christopher Schultz
possible to bind to all interfaces, right? Just don't specify a specific interface when creating the server socket? - -chris >> -Original Message----- From: Christopher Schultz >> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:19 >> PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue with AJ

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-28 Thread Mark Thomas
6. > Is there a way tomcat can listen on both loopback addresses when available. Not that I am aware of with the Java API. Mark > > Thank you, > Kishore > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Schultz > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:19 PM > To: users@t

RE: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-28 Thread Satya Kishore Thumu
available. Thank you, Kishore -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:19 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue with AJP listener -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Satya, On 4/28/20 06:06, Satya Kishore Thumu wrote: > We

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Satya, On 4/28/20 06:06, Satya Kishore Thumu wrote: > We are using apache before Tomcat as front end and using modjk for > connection between apache and Tomcat. After upgrading tomcat(to > 7.0.100 as we have other dependencies we can't use latest as

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-28 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:39 PM Satya Kishore Thumu wrote: > *@Naga Ramesh*, > we are using apache 2.4.41 and AJP connector 2.4.48. > > worker.ajp13.port=8009 > worker.ajp13.host=localhost > These are entries that we use on Tomcat server.xml and use the same > entries for apache. > > *@martin* Ti

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-28 Thread Satya Kishore Thumu
*@Naga Ramesh*, we are using apache 2.4.41 and AJP connector 2.4.48. worker.ajp13.port=8009 worker.ajp13.host=localhost These are entries that we use on Tomcat server.xml and use the same entries for apache. *@martin* Till we upgraded to tomcat 7.0.100, we were able to use localhost both for IPv4

Re: Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-28 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 1:06 PM Satya Kishore Thumu wrote: > Hi, > We are using apache before Tomcat as front end and using modjk for > connection between apache and Tomcat. After upgrading tomcat(to 7.0.100 as > we have other dependencies we can't use latest as of now), i'm unable to > use

Issue with AJP listener

2020-04-28 Thread Satya Kishore Thumu
Hi, We are using apache before Tomcat as front end and using modjk for connection between apache and Tomcat. After upgrading tomcat(to 7.0.100 as we have other dependencies we can't use latest as of now), i'm unable to use ajp.host as "localhost" in IPv6 and works only with ::1. Need help if there