ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2006 17:10
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK Sticky Session Handling with Load Balancing
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestions, that has led to a solution I think.
I used the EAL valve to log inbound and outbound cookies as you
suggested.
Started both To
TECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2006 16:08
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JK Sticky Session Handling with Load Balancing
domain: you don't need the domain attribute. Domai has the following
purpose: Once you start replicating sessions between tomcats and you
build up a huge group of tomcat instan
ky_session=1
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Alves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2006 12:32
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JK Sticky Session Handling with Load Balancing
Hi there,
You're setting the sticky_session property for each worker. That's
not how it work
alancer.type=lb
worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=tomcat1,tomcat2
worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Alves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2006 14:36
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JK Sticky Session Handling with Load Balancing
Hi again,
This is almost always "I forgot to set jvmRoute in my server.xml".
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Alves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JK Sticky Session Handling with Load Balancing
Hi again,
When using t
lancer.balance_workers=tomcat1,tomcat2
> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Edgar Alves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 April 2006 12:32
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: JK Sticky Session Handling with Load Balancing
>
gt; -Original Message-----
> From: Edgar Alves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 April 2006 12:32
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: JK Sticky Session Handling with Load Balancing
>
> Hi there,
> You're setting the sticky_session property for each worker. Tha
dgar Alves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2006 12:32
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JK Sticky Session Handling with Load Balancing
Hi there,
You're setting the sticky_session property for each worker. That's not
how it works.
That property is valid only for the loadbal
: JK Sticky Session Handling with Load Balancing
Hi there,
You're setting the sticky_session property for each worker. That's not
how it works.
That property is valid only for the loadbalancer and it takes a
boolean value. Set it to 'True' or '1' to get t
Hi there,
You're setting the sticky_session property for each worker. That's not
how it works.
That property is valid only for the loadbalancer and it takes a
boolean value. Set it to 'True' or '1' to get the desired effect.
Read http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/config/workers.html for
Hi,
I have setup 2 Tomcats on the same machine fronted by IIS, and used a
sticky_session=1 JK (1.2.15) load-balanced setup (as printed at the foot
of this email)
I setup a JSP on both Tomcats that outputs the session ID.
With only 1 Tomcat started, making requests to the JSP results in the
same
11 matches
Mail list logo