On 09/02/2012 15:35, Jesse Farinacci wrote:
> What is the expected behavior? Is this a bug?
The expected behaviour is as you describe.
No it is not a bug.
Being able to specify the bind address is an enhancement request that
doesn't look too difficult to implement (and would remove the need for
2012/2/9 Jesse Farinacci :
> Greetings,
>
> I am using Apache Tomcat 7.0.25 using IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0
> IBM J9 2.4 Linux s390x-64 jvmxz6460sr8ifx-20100609_59383).
>
> Inspired by the flurry of JMX related questions on this list, I
> attempted to follow the official documentation[1] to e
Greetings,
I am using Apache Tomcat 7.0.25 using IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0
IBM J9 2.4 Linux s390x-64 jvmxz6460sr8ifx-20100609_59383).
Inspired by the flurry of JMX related questions on this list, I
attempted to follow the official documentation[1] to enable remote JMX
access. My sanitized c
