Joel,
On 8/11/23 11:16, Joel Werginz wrote:
Version: 8.5.64
maxHttpHeaderSize=³6553600²
Are you able to try with 8.5.91? Your version is more than 2 years old
and many fixes have been made to h2 stream handling in that time.
-chris
10-Aug-2023 16:36:21.530 FINE [https-openssl-apr-443
Version: 8.5.64
maxHttpHeaderSize=³6553600²
10-Aug-2023 16:36:21.530 FINE [https-openssl-apr-443-exec-7]
org.apache.coyote.http2.Http2UpgradeHandler.upgradeDispatch Entry,
Connection [1], SocketStatus [OPEN_READ]
10-Aug-2023 16:36:21.530 FINE [https-openssl-apr-443-exec-7
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2. If the protocol between HTTPD and Tomcat is AJP,
> then the protocol itself has its own limitation, which is ~15 times
> lesser than that amount.
Thanks for anticipating my next question. Right now we're using
mod_proxy with the HTTP
f 8190 bytes.
> Additionally, each header line can have a maximum length of 8190
> bytes. With the default maximum of 100 request fields, this means that
> httpd will accept a header of up to (101 * 8190) = 827,190 bytes in
> size.
>
> Let's say I'm fronting Tomcat with Ap
n size.
>
> Let's say I'm fronting Tomcat with Apache, and I set
> maxHttpHeaderSize to 827,190 bytes so that they have the same
> limit.
>
> Is a byte array of that size going to be allocated for each
> incoming request, regardless of how short or long it actually is?
* 8190) = 827,190 bytes in
size.
Let's say I'm fronting Tomcat with Apache, and I set maxHttpHeaderSize
to 827,190 bytes so that they have the same limit.
Is a byte array of that size going to be allocated for each incoming
request, regardless of how short or long it actually is?
And, in a wor
2012/9/28 Andrew Todd :
> I have a question about maxHttpHeaderSize [0]. In Apache httpd, there
> are two different parameters that affect the maximum size of an HTTP
> header, limitRequestFieldSize and limitRequestLine. [1] These
> configuration values specify about 8 kilobytes per _
I have a question about maxHttpHeaderSize [0]. In Apache httpd, there
are two different parameters that affect the maximum size of an HTTP
header, limitRequestFieldSize and limitRequestLine. [1] These
configuration values specify about 8 kilobytes per _line_ in the
incoming request. However, in
Fischereit, Jana wrote:
Hi,
I resolved my problem. The problem was that the method request.getInputStream().read() just finish reading the in the server.xml file defined maxHTTPHeaderSize of the inputStream. So I wrote my own method to read the inputsteam and everything works fine.
Besides I
Hi,
I resolved my problem. The problem was that the method
request.getInputStream().read() just finish reading the in the server.xml file
defined maxHTTPHeaderSize of the inputStream. So I wrote my own method to read
the inputsteam and everything works fine.
Besides I changed my client-side
Pid wrote:
On 4/19/11 12:20 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Hi.
I will let someone else comment on your code.
I can say that doesn't look like i'd expect it to, per the example code
from the Commons HTTP 3.x or HTTP Client 4.x versions.
(But remember, this is a help forum for Tomcat, which is th
On 4/19/11 12:20 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I will let someone else comment on your code.
I can say that doesn't look like i'd expect it to, per the example code
from the Commons HTTP 3.x or HTTP Client 4.x versions.
> (But remember, this is a help forum for Tomcat, which is the server
Hi.
I will let someone else comment on your code.
(But remember, this is a help forum for Tomcat, which is the server side. It is not
really a forum to help people write Java HTTP cients).
It looks like this is your first try at sending a file to a server.
So let me recommend something :
I w
Thank you for your answer!
First I also thought that they have nothing to do with one another. But when I
tried to transfer a xml-file (size 9kb) it did not work. Afterwards I increased
the maxHTTPHeaderSize to 10 kb. So I concluded that the xml-stream is contained
in the body of the request
Fischereit, Jana wrote:
Hi,
I would like to send xml-files by using the http-post *request-body*.
(emphasis added)
But I read that the default maxHTTPHeaderSize is 8kb
max HTTP *Header* Size (emphasis added)
Nothing to do with one another
Hi,
I would like to send xml-files by using the http-post request-body. But I read
that the default maxHTTPHeaderSize is 8kb
(http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/http.html#Standard_Implementation).
So I cannot transfer files of arbitrary size.
Why is there a limit? May problems
Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is there a reason why InternalNioInputBuffer automatically grows its
>>>> buffer, effectively ignoring the maxHttpHeaderSize setting, while
>>>> InternalNioOutputBuffer doesn't? I was playing around w
So the bug is InternalNioInputBuffer not honoring maxHttpHeaderSize?
Yuesong
On Jan 21, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/01/2011 13:55, Yuesong Wang wrote:
>> Just to confirm, it is a bug in the InputBuffer, not OutputBuffer?
>
> InputBuffer, yes.
>
> OutputB
> On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 21/01/2011 00:53, Yuesong Wang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a reason why InternalNioInputBuffer automatically grows its
>>> buffer, effectively ignoring the maxHttpHeaderSize setting, whil
t; effectively ignoring the maxHttpHeaderSize setting, while
>> InternalNioOutputBuffer doesn't? I was playing around with the setting, and
>> set it to a rather small value. While large requests seem to go through
>> without an issue due to the automatic expansion of the bu
On 21/01/2011 00:53, Yuesong Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason why InternalNioInputBuffer automatically grows its buffer,
> effectively ignoring the maxHttpHeaderSize setting, while
> InternalNioOutputBuffer doesn't? I was playing around with the setting, and
> s
Hi,
Is there a reason why InternalNioInputBuffer automatically grows its buffer,
effectively ignoring the maxHttpHeaderSize setting, while
InternalNioOutputBuffer doesn't? I was playing around with the setting, and set
it to a rather small value. While large requests seem to go through wi
bug against Tomcat? It really should be
returning 413 or 414 as appropriate. Can you write a test that should
generate a 414 (with a huge Request-URI) and one with more than
maxHttpHeaderSize bytes (obviously, you can set this to something
semi-low to trigger it), say, by sending lots of heade
l exists, you'll need to upgrade to get a fix for it, anyway.
>
> - -chris
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/URL-Exceeding-maxHttpHeaderSize-tp28687322p28700228.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whom it may concern,
On 5/27/2010 1:37 PM, glau_pldm wrote:
> connectionTimeout="2"
>redirectPort="8443"
>maxHttpHeaderSize="8192" />
>
> I&#
trying to send? An example would really
> help. So would your exact version of Tomcat.
>
> Can you post the rest of your configuration, too?
>
> - -chris
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/URL-Exceeding-maxHttpHeaderSize-tp28687322p28697519.ht
. 413 would probably be a better response for "too much header
information".
What size Request-URI are you trying to send? An example would really
help. So would your exact version of Tomcat.
> ideally I would like it to return a 414 error. I have my http
> connector configured
turn a 414
error. I have my http connector configured with maxHttpHeaderSize="8192"
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/URL-Exceeding-maxHttpHeaderSize-tp28687322p28687322.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list a
> From: Josef Galea [mailto:jos...@ccbilleu.com]
> Subject: maxHttpHeaderSize question
>
> Does the connector attribute maxHttpHeaderSize refer to the
> total size of all the headers, or of each individual header?
The total. BTW, the default is 8192 in Tomcat 6.0.18, not 4096;
Hi all,
Does the connector attribute maxHttpHeaderSize refer to the total size of
all the headers, or of each individual header?
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
Josef
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
nly 1 app server at a time and seems to
> > stop and start in bursts of sometimes over an hour, but then nothing for
> > several hours after that.
> > This is with Tomcat 5.5.20 and mod_jk 1.2.23.
> >
> > Is it possible that it is someone trying to provoke a DOS or sh
ts of sometimes over an hour, but then nothing for
several hours after that.
This is with Tomcat 5.5.20 and mod_jk 1.2.23.
Is it possible that it is someone trying to provoke a DOS or should I
really investigate increasing the maxhttpheadersize in server.xml and
max_http_size in Mod_jk?
Than
.2.23.
Is it possible that it is someone trying to provoke a DOS or should I
really investigate increasing the maxhttpheadersize in server.xml and
max_http_size in Mod_jk?
Thanks for any help,
Rob
2007-08-08 08:36:47,579 ERROR [ ] [org.apache.jk.common.MsgAjp] Buffer
overflow
: buffer.len=819
Hi all,
I am using Tomcat 5.5.12. When I set the maxHttpHeaderSize to a low
value and send a large header, my HTTPClient throws
"org.apache.commons.httpclient.NoHttpResponseException: The server
localhost failed to respond"
exception. Is this the expected behavior? Will Tomcat abort
Hi all,
I am using Tomcat 5.5.12. When I set the maxHttpHeaderSize to a low
value and send a large header, my HTTPClient throws
"org.apache.commons.httpclient.NoHttpResponseException: The server
localhost failed to respond"
exception. Is this the expected behavior? Will Tomcat abort
35 matches
Mail list logo
