Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-20 Thread Rashmi Rubdi
p://java.sun.com/products/jsp/reference/techart/unifiedEL.html talks about Unified EL and how to migrate to it, incase you do want to migrate to it. -Rashmi - Original Message From: Gerald Holl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:29:39 AM Sub

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-20 Thread Gerald Holl
Ali Kian wrote: Hi Gerald, I wrote the example [1] please verify your web.xml and faces-config.xml with example [1] And make sure to remove all tld file from WEB-INF folder and also mare sure you delete old jstl.jar Ali, faces-config and web.xml are definitely valid. Old jstl jars are not pr

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-16 Thread Ali Kian
--- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabbl

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-12 Thread Gerald Holl
Rémy Maucherat wrote: On 3/8/07, Gerald Holl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, I think I can't give you access to all the details of our (secret) project. Anyway, thanks for the offer. Ok, I am obviously not going to look at your application. What I meant is I would look at a minimal war (conta

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-08 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On 3/8/07, Gerald Holl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, I think I can't give you access to all the details of our (secret) project. Anyway, thanks for the offer. Ok, I am obviously not going to look at your application. What I meant is I would look at a minimal war (containing only one JSP). R

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-08 Thread Gerald Holl
Rémy Maucherat wrote: On 3/8/07, Gerald Holl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I extracted the jstl-1.2jar file and found many .tld files. Nearly all of them contain 1.2 and not 2.1 as you said. Only tags version 2.1 will be passed deferred expressions. The .tlds need to have a declaration like this

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-08 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On 3/8/07, Gerald Holl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I extracted the jstl-1.2jar file and found many .tld files. Nearly all of them contain 1.2 and not 2.1 as you said. Only tags version 2.1 will be passed deferred expressions. The .tlds need to have a declaration like this one: http://java.sun.co

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-08 Thread Gerald Holl
David Delbecq wrote: En l'instant précis du 07/03/07 14:43, Gerald Holl s'exprimait en ces termes: David Delbecq wrote: En l'instant précis du 07/03/07 12:04, Gerald Holl s'exprimait en ces termes: David Delbecq wrote: Please provide the full jsp please. Side note: JSF and non-JSF tags do not

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-07 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On 3/7/07, David Delbecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [1] unified EL refers to jsp 2.1 specifications, i was referring to 2.0 specifications. To ensure you are using 2.1 specifications, check mainly that - your taglib contains "2.1" - your webapplication is properly configured to use the webapp2.5

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-07 Thread David Delbecq
En l'instant précis du 07/03/07 14:43, Gerald Holl s'exprimait en ces termes: > David Delbecq wrote: >> En l'instant précis du 07/03/07 12:04, Gerald Holl s'exprimait en ces >> termes: >>> David Delbecq wrote: Please provide the full jsp please. Side note: JSF and non-JSF tags do not mix

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-07 Thread Gerald Holl
David Delbecq wrote: En l'instant précis du 07/03/07 12:04, Gerald Holl s'exprimait en ces termes: David Delbecq wrote: Please provide the full jsp please. Side note: JSF and non-JSF tags do not mix very well. Sorry, should have seen it in your first message: items="#{handler.

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-07 Thread David Delbecq
En l'instant précis du 07/03/07 12:04, Gerald Holl s'exprimait en ces termes: > David Delbecq wrote: >> Please provide the full jsp please. >> Side note: JSF and non-JSF tags do not mix very well. > > > > > Sorry, should have seen it in your first message: items="#{handler.fields}"

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-07 Thread Per Jonsson
There is a newer version of the jsf implementation at: https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=7028&expandFolder=7028&folderID=0 Probably not that but worth checking. I also read someware that the 1.2 implementation (or parts of it) require a valid web.xml wit

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-07 Thread Gerald Holl
David Delbecq wrote: Please provide the full jsp please. Side note: JSF and non-JSF tags do not mix very well. Here is the full JSP page: <%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"; prefix="h"%> <%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"; prefix="f"%> <%@ taglib prefix="c" uri="http://ja

Re: Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-07 Thread David Delbecq
Please provide the full jsp please. Side note: JSF and non-JSF tags do not mix very well. En l'instant précis du 07/03/07 11:14, Gerald Holl s'exprimait en ces termes: > Hello, > > JSTL is not working on Tomcat 6, the JSTL specific code never gets > executed. > > Consider the following JSP page fr

Possible JSTL/EL bug in 6.0.10

2007-03-07 Thread Gerald Holl
Hello, JSTL is not working on Tomcat 6, the JSTL specific code never gets executed. Consider the following JSP page fragment: The list property is a simple java.util.List. A Object[] is not working too. In the bean the getList() method should be called but this never happens. Thus, the