Re: Question regarding mappings for CVE-2005-4836

2012-02-08 Thread Christopher Restorff
If you carefully read the security report for Tomcat 4, you'll see that the bug exists in a deprecated connector. If you are using the standard Coyote connector, then you are safe. For completeness, these are the connectors that are vulnerable to this issue: org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConn

Re: Question regarding mappings for CVE-2005-4836

2012-02-07 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christopher, On 2/7/12 3:01 PM, Christopher Restorff wrote: > I have a question regarding CVE-2005-4836: > http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2005-4836 Wow. Blast from the past. > The security bulletin, http://tomcat.apache.org/sec

Re: Question regarding mappings for CVE-2005-4836

2012-02-07 Thread Au, Leon
On 2/7/12 12:01 PM, "Christopher Restorff" wrote: >Hello, > >I have a question regarding CVE-2005-4836: >http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2005-4836 > >The security bulletin, http://tomcat.apache.org/security-4.html, >mentions that it will not be fixed in 4.x. However, there is

Question regarding mappings for CVE-2005-4836

2012-02-07 Thread Christopher Restorff
Hello, I have a question regarding CVE-2005-4836: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2005-4836 The security bulletin, http://tomcat.apache.org/security-4.html, mentions that it will not be fixed in 4.x. However, there is no indication as to whether it affects 5.x or beyond. Is t