RE: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-20 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... > > > Was that vs BIO or NIO? As I recall, there is no sendFile > > capability in BIO, so both NIO and APR should beat that. > > BIO = JIO, right? Too many TLAs

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-20 Thread Tony Anecito
:40 AM Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 7/20/2010 12:35 AM, Tony Anecito wrote: > Interesting. I saw that when a static file was around 21K or below a dramatic > improvement in recorded time in the log for APR. I have not tried with

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-20 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 7/20/2010 12:35 AM, Tony Anecito wrote: > Interesting. I saw that when a static file was around 21K or below a dramatic > improvement in recorded time in the log for APR. I have not tried with > regular > Apache Web Server to see what I ge

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-20 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, On 7/19/2010 11:50 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] >> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... >> >> My tests show that use of sendFile is dramatically faste

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-20 Thread Tony Anecito
- Original Message From: Pid To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 10:11:39 AM Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... On 19/07/2010 22:21, Tony Anecito wrote: > Hi Pid > > First off I get a little red x in the upper left hand corner of the web page. Excellent technical d

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-20 Thread Pid
ot? p > Best Regards, > -Tony > > > > - Original Message > From: Pid > To: Tomcat Users List > Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 3:05:41 PM > Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... > > On 19/07/2010 19:44, Tony Anecito wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I ha

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-20 Thread André Warnier
Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dale, On 7/19/2010 7:42 PM, Dale Ogilvie wrote: Reasons to use httpd being what? Here are a few ideas: 1. Load balancing 2. Use of mixed Java and non-Java webapps (PHP, Perl, etc.) 3. Use of multiple Tomcat instances b

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Tony Anecito
Users List Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 9:50:59 PM Subject: RE: APR & Tomcat... > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... > > My tests show that use of sendFile is dramatically faster > than without. Was that vs BIO or NIO? 

RE: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... > > My tests show that use of sendFile is dramatically faster > than without. Was that vs BIO or NIO? As I recall, there is no sendFile capability in BIO, so both NIO and A

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dale, On 7/19/2010 7:42 PM, Dale Ogilvie wrote: > Reasons to use httpd being what? Here are a few ideas: 1. Load balancing 2. Use of mixed Java and non-Java webapps (PHP, Perl, etc.) 3. Use of multiple Tomcat instances behind a single web server If

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, On 7/19/2010 9:57 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com] >> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... >> >> So as to say the Tomcat group did not want to compete >> why build t

RE: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com] > Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... > > The disadvantages are such as when Tomcat is taken down > so does your static content. So why are you taking Tomcat down? "Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this!" > I am gue

RE: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Dale Ogilvie [mailto:dale.ogil...@trimble.co.nz] > Subject: RE: APR & Tomcat... > > Reasons to use httpd being what? Serving PHP and as a poor man's load balancer, for starters. > The reason we used httpd in the past was "httpd serves > static content

RE: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com] > Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... > > So as to say the Tomcat group did not want to compete > why build the APR? Tomcat people did not create it - APR has been around for years. It's part of many products (e.g., subve

RE: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Richard Maynard
be used to tune the heck out of static and semi-static content! -- Richard Maynard -Original Message- From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 7:42 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... I used APR for performance reasons. I was runn

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Tony Anecito
load balancing. So APR Native was an experiment for me not a final solution. Time to go back to reality. Thanks, -Tony - Original Message From: Dale Ogilvie To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 5:42:39 PM Subject: RE: APR & Tomcat... Reasons to use httpd being what

RE: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Dale Ogilvie
.m. To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... There certainly are reasons to use Apache httpd out in front of Tomcat, but performance isn't one of them. - -chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apa

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Tony Anecito
ate the feedback. Regards, -Tony - Original Message From: Christopher Schultz To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 3:51:28 PM Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 7/19/2010 5:21 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > First off I g

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 7/19/2010 5:21 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > First off I get a little red x in the upper left hand corner of the web page. For the whole page? I thought this was an image problem. > Yep I agree maybe an upgrade to the latest Tomcat and APR migh

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Tony Anecito
: Mon, July 19, 2010 3:05:41 PM Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat... On 19/07/2010 19:44, Tony Anecito wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been having odd issues with APR & Tomcat (6.0.20) since I set it up a > while ago. I am seeing: Time for an upgrade. > 1. Sometimes on the first t

Re: APR & Tomcat...

2010-07-19 Thread Pid
On 19/07/2010 19:44, Tony Anecito wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been having odd issues with APR & Tomcat (6.0.20) since I set it up a > while ago. I am seeing: Time for an upgrade. > 1. Sometimes on the first try to get images from a page where the images are > assigned a sub domain via a host t