[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
useNaming does not affect here, correct.
What's the reason ignoring the path attribute? (6.0.14 ignores as well)
It isn't needed. The path is derived from the file name.
Mark
-
To start a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
useNaming does not affect here, correct.
What's the reason ignoring the path attribute? (6.0.14 ignores as well)
Because it's only used when the context is defined in server.xml and the
path can't be derived from the name of the deployed context.xml file.
p
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 18:58 +0100, Pid wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
useNaming does not affect here, correct.
What's the reason ignoring the path attribute? (6.0.14 ignores as well)
Because it's only used when the context is defined in server.xml and the
path can't be
From: Scott McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Application outside WEBAPPS
What if you want the path to the application to differ from
the name of the deployed application?
Several options:
1) Correct the name of the deployed .war file (or expanded directory
