Re: Diagnosing DBCP JDBC connection leak using removeAbandoned parm

2006-04-06 Thread Darryl L. Miles
Richard Mixon wrote: Marc, Thank you - We are using a recent version of the MySQL Connector/J (3.1.10), but maybe that does not mean anything. - Richard Hmm thats not very recent. I know of 2 bugs since then that have bitten me. 3.1.13 should be brewing and that would be the first

RE: Diagnosing DBCP JDBC connection leak using removeAbandoned parm

2006-04-05 Thread Farrow, Marc
Can you change your code to something similar to below? I have seen issues with certain implementations of database drivers in which the JDBC interfaces are not being implemented/coded properly. Just remember that the order you call your close statements does matter (although yours looked

RE: Diagnosing DBCP JDBC connection leak using removeAbandoned parm - short version

2006-04-05 Thread Richard Mixon
I'm still curious about the crazy logAbandoned messages - not sure how to interpret or rely on them. I'll try a again with a briefer posting - maybe I was too detailed in the original post. We are getting strange (erroneous?) messages because of the logAbandoned parameter: 1) The dates look

RE: Diagnosing DBCP JDBC connection leak using removeAbandoned parm

2006-04-05 Thread Richard Mixon
JDBC connection leak using removeAbandoned parm Can you change your code to something similar to below? I have seen issues with certain implementations of database drivers in which the JDBC interfaces are not being implemented/coded properly. Just remember that the order you call your close

Re: Diagnosing DBCP JDBC connection leak using removeAbandoned parm

2006-04-05 Thread David Smith
version of the MySQL Connector/J (3.1.10), but maybe that does not mean anything. - Richard -Original Message- From: Farrow, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 4:44 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Diagnosing DBCP JDBC connection leak using

Re: Diagnosing DBCP JDBC connection leak using removeAbandoned parm - short version

2006-04-05 Thread Mark Lai
#1 Could be a logging bug. Notice how the day is always the same as the minute. On 4/5/06, Richard Mixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still curious about the crazy logAbandoned messages - not sure how to interpret or rely on them. I'll try a again with a briefer posting - maybe I was too