h heavier loader.
That's some thinking that I want to share with you.
2008/6/18 Steve Ochani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Date sent: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:32:41 +0100
> From: James Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:RE: Jrockit Vs Sun
Date sent: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:32:41 +0100
From: James Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Jrockit Vs Sun
To: Tomcat Users List
Send reply to: Tomcat Users List
> Here are the download links
> http://comm
om: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 June 2008 18:31
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
--
It seems to be licensed, ie not free, and if you can figure out how to
download the thing from that site, you're a better detective than I am.
It seems to b
I talked to the lead developer for JRockit months ago
and he told me they take the code from Sun releases
and add it to all the releases. What that means is
thier 1.4.x is as fast as the 1.5.x but the difference
is functionality they do not port 1.5 functionality to
1.4.x.
This is important to me
Hello,
i have tested synchronized vs. atomic performance two years ago with
both jrockit and sun 1.5, both 32 bit, and
jrockit was clearly faster in synchronization and slower in atomics.
But its of cause its far outdated.
http://moskito.anotheria.net/AtomicVsSynchronized.html
regards
Leon
On
configurable. I would suggest looking at the docs for an
> authorative answer.
>
> peter
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
>>
>> One thing that is different in JRockit is it dynamically
>> resizes the perm generation, so in some cases it's better
>> than SUN jvm.
>
> Last time I looked, JRockit didn't actually have a generational
&g
> From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
>
> One thing that is different in JRockit is it dynamically
> resizes the perm generation, so in some cases it's better
> than SUN jvm.
Last time I looked, JRockit didn't actually have a generat
I've compared JRockit 1.4 and 1.5 in the past against SUN and it was
faster for synthetic benchmarks.
I don't work for BEA, but I do like JRockit. One thing that is
different in JRockit is it dynamically resizes the perm generation, so
in some cases it's better than SUN jvm.
peter
On Tue, Jun 1
> From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Jrockit Vs Sun
>
> It seems to be Suns JRE
It's not - different code base for the JVM core. The Java portion of the JRE
and some of the native libraries may be the same.
When we tried it several years ago, it was sli
- Original Message -
From: "James Law" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:56 PM
Subject: Jrockit Vs Sun
Ok not quite a Vs question, however I'm intrigued by BEA claim that
Jrockit is the "industry leading solutions".
Does anyone have any experience in Jrockit
James Law wrote:
xyz is the "industry leading solution".
That's not exactly a precise scientific or technical expression.
I suppose that when marketing guys get together to create literature
about a product, the conversation goes about like this :
- Ok guys, we need to claim something in ord
12 matches
Mail list logo
