RE: License query for jstl.jar

2006-06-13 Thread Simon Kitching
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 1:23 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: License query for jstl.jar > > Simon Kitching wrote: > > Actually, every file I've looked at in the jakart

Re: License query for jstl.jar

2006-06-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Simon Kitching wrote: > Actually, every file I've looked at in the jakarta taglibs project DOES have > the standard ASL2.0 licensing embedded in it, and in addition they all > contain an Apache Foundation copyright statement: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/servletapi/servlet2.4-jsp2.0-tc5

RE: License query for jstl.jar

2006-06-13 Thread Simon Kitching
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 12:42 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: License query for jstl.jar > > IANAL... Understood; I'm grateful for your comments anyway..

Re: License query for jstl.jar

2006-06-13 Thread Mark Thomas
IANAL... Simon Kitching wrote: > Unfortunately, in order to satisfy both my companies' lawyers and the > client's lawyers I think I would need to show that this jar is indeed built > from ASL-licensed code. This is *not* ASL licenced code. > Does anyone have a link to a page from Sun that shows

RE: License query for jstl.jar

2006-06-13 Thread Simon Kitching
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:32 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: License query for jstl.jar > > Simon Kitching wrote: > > However it isn't clear to me whether the

Re: License query for jstl.jar

2006-06-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Simon Kitching wrote: > However it isn't clear to me whether the license for this jar in fact allows > this to be checked in. > The jar has > Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc. > and > Implementation-Version: 1.1.0-D13 The Servlet expert group used the Apache repository to develop