Re: [OT obviously] Re: Some Prilim questions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin, Martin Gainty wrote: > In other words if you have an opportunity to attack someone instead > of providing an intelligent solution then yes by all means CHANGE the > question (so you'll look good and the other guy looks like an > idiot..) from

Re: [OT obviously] Re: Some Prilim questions

recipient. > Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this > transmission. > > >> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:18:28 +0100 >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: users@tomcat.apache.org >> Subject: [OT obviously] Re: Some Prilim questions >>

Re: [OT obviously] Re: Some Prilim questions

. The gamma energies used generally range from 0,05 MeV to 3 MeV." Yes!! That is exactly I need to able to read this list. 3 Megawatti minimum, forget about electronVolts. Even better 5 GigaWatt. Where is the LHC when I need it ?? to generate some black holes ?? János ---

RE: [OT obviously] Re: Some Prilim questions

than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. > Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:18:28 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: [OT obviously] Re: Some Prilim questions > > Martin Gainty wrote: &g

Re: [OT obviously] Re: Some Prilim questions

the right place! >> >> >> Your message is revealed Al, as a message of peace and understanding, >> for Ashoka is famous for his message of freedom, tolerance, and equality. >> >> >> I was worn out from my exertions, but gloriously sated as I collapsed >>

Re: [OT obviously] Re: Some Prilim questions

party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:35:05 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Some Prilim questions David, David Smith wrote: I hav

[OT obviously] Re: Some Prilim questions

-mail and any attachments relates to the official > business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender > does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. > Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this > transmission. &

RE: Some Prilim questions

nature and Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. > Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:35:05 -0400 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re:

Re: Some Prilim questions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David, David Smith wrote: > I have no idea where you are going with this ... it makes no sense to > the original question. Aah... there's your problem. Martin's not good with these things. On the other hand, /one/ part of his statement does make sen

Re: Some Prilim questions

ily endorse content contained within this >> transmission. >> >> >> >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> To: users@tomcat.apache.org >>> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:56:53 +0530 >>> Subject: RE: Some Prilim questions >>> >>

Re: Some Prilim questions

t;> To: users@tomcat.apache.org >> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:56:53 +0530 >> Subject: RE: Some Prilim questions >> >> Hi >> >> Ok, I have read the link provided >> >> This answers the 2nd Question >> >> What about the first Question ?

RE: Some Prilim questions

Hi Good Joke :( With regards Karthik -Original Message- From: Martin Gainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:19 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Some Prilim questions the referenced jndi lookup in the webapp context is located in India and the DB

RE: Some Prilim questions

ithin this transmission. > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:56:53 +0530 > Subject: RE: Some Prilim questions > > Hi > > Ok, I have read the link provided > > This answers the 2nd Question > > What about the first Questio

RE: Some Prilim questions

TECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:48 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: RE: Some Prilim questions read this http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/jndi-datasource-examples-howto.html Martin __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everythi

RE: Some Prilim questions

read this http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/jndi-datasource-examples-howto.html Martin __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business of Sender. This transmission is of a c

Re: Some Prilim questions

> > 1) Which is faster JNDI Based Connection pool / ordinary JDBC based > connection / close ? JNDI based connection pool. The connections are potentially already formed and ready for use when you call for one. Ordinary JDBC would explicitly create a new connection everytime you need one