RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request

2006-08-14 Thread YuanGao Zhang
Thanks a lot, Mark. That's the answer I was looking for. -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 1:45 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request Propes, Barry L wrote: > I'll have to double

RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request

2006-08-14 Thread Propes, Barry L
yeah, that's what I meant. Sorry, I'm sure I explained it very poorly. -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 4:03 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request Propes, Barry L wrote: > part of

Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request

2006-08-14 Thread Mark Thomas
Propes, Barry L wrote: > part of the HTTP spec, but essentially it achieves what FTP would, doesn't > it? i.e. putting files (binary or other to a directory?). > Sorry if I'm mistaken on this. Not meaning to mislead or confuse. The end result is the same but is is done over http rather than ftp.

RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request

2006-08-14 Thread Propes, Barry L
August 14, 2006 3:45 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request Propes, Barry L wrote: > I'll have to double check...maybe not, but I was thinking it did. It most certainly does not. PUT is part of the HTTP spec and has nothing to do with FTP. Check conf/web.xm

Re: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request

2006-08-14 Thread Mark Thomas
Propes, Barry L wrote: > I'll have to double check...maybe not, but I was thinking it did. It most certainly does not. PUT is part of the HTTP spec and has nothing to do with FTP. Check conf/web.xml for the readonly parameter of the DefaultServlet. Mark -

RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request

2006-08-11 Thread YuanGao Zhang
Thanks. -Original Message- From: Propes, Barry L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:44 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request I'll have to double check...maybe not, but I was thinking it did. -Original Message- From:

RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request

2006-08-11 Thread Propes, Barry L
I'll have to double check...maybe not, but I was thinking it did. -Original Message- From: YuanGao Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 5:43 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request I don't think so. I can ftp to the

RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request

2006-08-11 Thread YuanGao Zhang
I don't think so. I can ftp to the host where tomcat runs. Does Tomcat rely on FTP for processing put requests? -Original Message- From: Propes, Barry L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:30 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT re

RE: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request

2006-08-11 Thread Propes, Barry L
maybe the FTP port is blocked? Isn't that what PUT essentially does? -Original Message- From: YuanGao Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 5:27 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Tomcat 5.5.17 rejects PUT request Hello, I'm new to tomcat and have problems t