> From: King, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Webapp load order tomcat 4 vs tomcat 5
>
> Unfortunately that would break the SDK. I am going to look into the
> route of having one webapp watch for the other one to come on line.
What about not implementing another w
Subject: Re: Webapp load order tomcat 4 vs tomcat 5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean,
King, Sean wrote:
> It's a lomg story, but basically I am hooking into an SDK supplied by
> a third party. The fact that I need to access jars in another web app
> is their desig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean,
King, Sean wrote:
> It's a lomg story, but basically I am hooking into an SDK supplied by a
> third party. The fact that I need to access jars in another web app is
> their design.
:(
Ar you allowed to copy those JAR files into your own app? I
PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Webapp load order tomcat 4 vs tomcat 5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean,
King, Sean wrote:
> When I
> start tomcat, app2 is deployed and then app1 starts and is able to
> access jars in app2.
Uh... care to explain what /that/ mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean,
King, Sean wrote:
> So, to cut a long story short, my app needs to register with the
> supplied web app for the integration to work.
You could always deploy them into separate TC instances. Then you can
just start one of them before the other.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean,
King, Sean wrote:
> When I
> start tomcat, app2 is deployed and then app1 starts and is able to
> access jars in app2.
Uh... care to explain what /that/ means? Why are you having one app
steal JAR files out of another one? And furthermore, why
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 10:21 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Webapp load order tomcat 4 vs tomcat 5
Sean,
From your description, it seems that communication between the 2 apps
is done over the wire.
If that is the case, why not run each under a separate JVM/Applicat
> From: King, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Webapp load order tomcat 4 vs tomcat 5
>
> How would running two JVM's help?
It wouldn't. Your problem is one of synchronization, not classloader
conflicts.
You might try implementing a listener in app1 that pe
owther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:36 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Webapp load order tomcat 4 vs tomcat 5
>
>
>> From: King, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For the application to run
>> correctly, app2 must be deployed
ms to work seamlessly with tomcat5 and this methodology is what
we are planning to go into production with.
Now it sounds like a bad idea!!
-Original Message-
From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Webapp load or
07 9:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Webapp load order tomcat 4 vs tomcat 5
> From: King, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For the application to run
> correctly, app2 must be deployed and start before app1. Using tomcat 5
> this does not seem to be a problem. When I st
> From: King, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For the application to run correctly, app2 must be deployed and start
> before app1. Using tomcat 5 this does not seem to be a problem. When I
> start tomcat, app2 is deployed and then app1 starts and is able to
> access jars in app2. I am hoping that
Webapp load order is indeed pretty much by chance. No guarantee has
ever been made regarding any start order. I would recommend you add
code to app1 so it can gracefully deal with the chance app2 is not
available.
--David
King, Sean wrote:
Hi all,
I have two webapps that need to interac
13 matches
Mail list logo
