If you're running on a UNIX variant, use JSVC. The source is included in
the tomcat download in bin/commons-daemon/native.tar.gz.
On 11/4/2015 10:20 AM, Linux Support wrote:
Hi again,
configured the TC service to run as a non privileged user. In my
understanding we cannot use a privileged
2015-11-04 20:20 GMT+03:00 Linux Support :
> Hi again,
>
> configured the TC service to run as a non privileged user. In my
> understanding we cannot use a privileged port to bind TC to. Is there a way
> i can use port 80 for TC in the case of using a non root user ?
2014-02-25 16:55 GMT+04:00 Ja kub jjaku...@gmail.com:
Hi
Do you know if in Tomcat is something similar to jboss port-offset ?
-Djboss.socket.binding.port-offset=100
It would be convinient for starting several tomcats on the same operating
system. No need to change ports in server.xml
On 14/05/2013 04:34, Chirag Dewan wrote:
You need to destroy the connector to close the port.
Mark,
That seems to work. :)
Now the port is free. But is it the right approach?
You had a problem you couldn't solve. Someone with an @apache.org e-mail
address (i.e. an Apache committer
On 5/14/2013 5:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/05/2013 04:34, Chirag Dewan wrote:
You need to destroy the connector to close the port.
Mark,
That seems to work. :)
Now the port is free. But is it the right approach?
You had a problem you couldn't solve. Someone with an @apache.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chirag,
On 5/13/13 11:34 AM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
I am embedding Apache Tomcat 7.0.30 in my application. I am using
the Tomcat class,and my application requires dynamic addition and
removal of connectors(HTTP).
Now while removing the
on port 1090 and 8080.
I really dont understand what wrong I might be doing.
Thanks
From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 13 May 2013 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Port still busy after
Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 13 May 2013 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Port still busy after removing connector in Embedded Tomcat 7.0.30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chirag,
On 5/13/13 11:34 AM, Chirag Dewan wrote
@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 13 May 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: Port still busy after removing connector in Embedded Tomcat 7.0.30
Chirag Dewan wrote:
How do you observe that the connector is still bound to the port?
Yes. I used netstat to observe that. Plus when I try to add another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chirag,
On 5/13/13 1:03 PM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
If the context was removed, but the Connector was still there,
should you not get a 404 Not Found, rather than a timeout ?
If I am calling the removeConnector, shouldn't it cleanup the
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: Port still busy after removing connector in Embedded Tomcat
7.0.30
If I am calling the removeConnector, shouldn't it cleanup the
context and the free the port?
In theory, yes, but ...
How long are you
On 13/05/2013 16:34, Chirag Dewan wrote:
Hi,
I am embedding Apache Tomcat 7.0.30 in my application. I am using the Tomcat
class,and my application requires dynamic addition and removal of
connectors(HTTP).
Now while removing the connectors,the application gets undeployed but the
port
From: Caldarale, Charles R
Subject: RE: Port still busy after removing connector in Embedded Tomcat
7.0.30
How long are you waiting? Can you give us the specifics of your
connector configuration? I wonder if the connector is remaining open
for something like a keepalive timeout (I
List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 14 May 2013 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: Port still busy after removing connector in Embedded Tomcat 7.0.30
On 13/05/2013 16:34, Chirag Dewan wrote:
Hi,
I am embedding Apache Tomcat 7.0.30 in my application. I am using the Tomcat
class,and my
netstat -a
from a Command window, will show you all the ports in use on any Windows
server.
-Original Message-
From: Venky Vasant [mailto:venkat...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 25 March 2009 13:10
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Port range
I am sure this is very simple question but i could
Venky Vasant wrote:
I am sure this is very simple question but i could not find a proper information
Where do i find the official information about what port range can be used for
tomcat server port and HTTP connector port for all windows servers.
Regards
Venkat
You can use any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vanky,
On 3/25/2009 9:09 AM, Venky Vasant wrote:
I am sure this is very simple question but i could not find a proper
information
Where do i find the official information about what port range can be
used for tomcat server port and HTTP
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vanky,
On 3/25/2009 9:09 AM, Venky Vasant wrote:
I am sure this is very simple question but i could not find a proper
information
Where do i find the official information about what port range can be
used for tomcat
kjwchu wrote:
I have an application which is running on jakarta-tomcat-4.1.31. Now I want
to move this application in apache-tomcat-6.0.16. I wonder if anyone has
this experience or any thoughts about what areas I would need to make
changes and so on. Thanks!
The war should just work. You
go through the web.xml file in the web-inf floder
you have to include details in servlet/servlet and
servlet mapping/servlet mapping
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 8:56 PM, kjwchu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an application which is running on jakarta-tomcat-4.1.31. Now I want
to move this
use mok_jk
Melanie Pfefer wrote:
Hello
a servlet is running on port 9000 while apache in
running on port 80.
Is there a way to change this behavior so that users
who type
http://server1/OpenObject?doc=ERW
will receive the same content of
http://server1:9000/OpenObject?doc=ERW but the URL
use mok_jk
Melanie Pfefer wrote:
Hello
a servlet is running on port 9000 while apache in
running on port 80.
Is there a way to change this behavior so that users
who type
http://server1/OpenObject?doc=ERW
will receive the same content of
http://server1:9000/OpenObject?doc=ERW but the
Much simpler than what I said... no idea why I didn't think of it. Simplicity
is key :)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quinta-feira, 31 de Janeiro de 2008 15:46
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: port
From: Tony Chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL
From: Tony Chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We had tomcat running on port 8080 (which is default).
Since some people block that port we moved it to the
http port 80. Now some places that are expecting it on 8080
can't find it anymore.
Anyway to have it run on both? Maybe forward from
Hi,
You can have an apache HTTPd redirecting it to port 8080 of Tomcat.
Additionaly, if you're on Linux, you can do port forwarding with IPTables
-Original Message-
From: Tony Chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quinta-feira, 31 de Janeiro de 2008 15:18
To:
I can't figure out the iptable commands to do it.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Peter Crowther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Tony Chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We had tomcat running on port 8080 (which is default).
Since some people block that port we moved it to the
http
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: port
I can't figure out the iptable commands to do it.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Peter Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Tony Chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We had tomcat running on port 8080 (which is default).
Since some
when you go on normal websites, you are using port 80.
look for 8080 in your server.xml and change it to 80
bye
On Nov 20, 2007 3:14 PM, jdpl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
how come when I'm accessing a page on my local apache, i always have to put
in the port number, e.g:
When you don't give your browser get a port number, it assumes port 80
which is the registered, well known port for web traffic as defined by
the IANA. Production websites all listen on port 80 which is why you
never have to put it in your URLs to Google for example. The entire
list of these
From: lightbulb432 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Port-based virtual hosting
If you somehow have multiple contexts (within the same Host
or Service, or within different ones in your Tomcat instance)
that point to the same WAR file or docBase, are there multiple
instances
From: lightbulb432 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Port-based virtual hosting
Is there any functional difference between the two
options - if they're both even possible? Which would
you go with?
- 1 Service element with 5 HTTP connectors (each on a
different port) and one Engine
The question's more of a general one to help me understand some elements in
server.xml. Maybe I'll start with this question first, though:
If you somehow have multiple contexts (within the same Host or Service, or
within different ones in your Tomcat instance) that point to the same WAR
file or
Dave Sailer wrote:
I'm running tomcat 5.5 and sniffing out problems with a somewhat complex
web site. After deploying the war into the running tomcat, I go to the
home page and get some exceptions. Looking at the sniffer output, most
of the requests are to localhost:8080, but some are to just
more detail: we have a customer 404 error page with...
:iframe src=http://www.blahblah.net/mypage.html; width=100%
height=105 scrolling=no frameborder=0/iframe
The build script replaces http://www.blahblah.net with
http://test.blahblah.net and my hosts file maps test.blahblah.net to
From: Dave Sailer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: port problem
more detail: we have a customer 404 error page with...
:iframe src=http://www.blahblah.net/mypage.html; width=100%
height=105 scrolling=no frameborder=0/iframe
Why don't you just get rid of the http
I can't do that because, well, you know how this business is. I will
just run on port 80.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Dave Sailer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: port problem
more detail: we have a customer 404 error page with...
:iframe src=http://www.blahblah.net/mypage.html
1:53 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Port 8443 won't become active
When we contracted our upgrades the consultant installed version 1.4.2 but
when I just ran java -version the box tells me that 1.3.1 is the one
running in memory! I've never stopped/started java, etc. and I plan on
making
List
Subject: Re: Port 8443 won't become active (UNCLASSIFIED)
JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/security/java.security:ssl.KeyManagerFactory.algorithm=Sun
X509
JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/deploy.jar - found in here
JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/jsse.jar - and here
This is the default for a normal sun installation.
What IBM does
!
Thanks!
jeff
-Original Message-
From: Mike Sabroff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Port 8443 won't become active (UNCLASSIFIED)
JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/security/java.security:ssl.KeyManagerFactory.algorithm=Sun
X509
JAVA_HOME
From: Jeffery G. Summers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Port 8443 won't become active
Our webserver is an IBM P615C AIX 5.2 box. I have attempted
the following to enable port 8443:
1) keytool -genkey -alias tomcat -keyalg RSA
2) Edited server.xml and uncommented the port 8443
From: Jeffery G. Summers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our webserver is an IBM P615C AIX 5.2 box.
Whose JVM and what version?
- Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Message-
From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:28 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Port 8443 won't become active
From: Jeffery G. Summers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our webserver is an IBM P615C AIX 5.2 box.
Whose JVM and what version
anyone have a Quickie Guide I could use?
Thanks!
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:28 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Port 8443 won't become active
From: Jeffery G. Summers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our
Hi Jeff,
when I had this problem it was caused by the presence of a file named
tcnative-1.dll in the ~/Tomcat 5.5/bin directory. When I removed that .dll
file, everything worked as described in the Tomcat documentation for SSL.
--Tony C.
-- Original message
44 matches
Mail list logo