On Yesterday at 11:58pm, RJ=Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RJ
RJ [..snip..]
RJ
RJ The ugly: stricter handling of JkMount/JkMountFile etc. with respect
RJ to virtual hosts. It should have behaved for a long time in the way,
RJ that mounts are not inherited between virtual hosts and also
Haroon Rafique wrote:
Your above question got me thinking and I said to myself, I don't harve any
VirtualHosts. And then, I remembered SSL. In my config for apache 2.2.6,
there is an include for conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf and of course :443 is
served via a VirtualHost.
Hmm, you might be
On Today at 5:45pm, MT=Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MT [..snip..]
MT
MT Hmm, you might be hitting the point here. When tightening up the vhost
MT mappings we probably overlooked the SSL (or any other protocol)
MT scenario, where the actual vhost is the same, only the protocol is
MT
