Jerry,
On 10/6/21 15:09, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Chris, thanks so much. But please bear with me. I'm in the slow
group I think I have a pretty good handle on creating the
authenticator. But take me from the top, using manager as an example.
In the web.xml file it has login auth-method set
Chris, thanks so much. But please bear with me. I'm in the slow
group I think I have a pretty good handle on creating the
authenticator. But take me from the top, using manager as an example.
In the web.xml file it has login auth-method set to BASIC. I'm assuming
that invokes
Jerry,
On 10/5/21 12:23, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
hi Chris, thanks for the feedback.
I'm not using JWTs. I'm just sending a base64 token made up of
"a:b:c:d:e". I don't mind cloning the BasicAuthenticator if that's
what's required. I'm still not understanding how TC will handle my
modified
hi Chris, thanks for the feedback.
I'm not using JWTs. I'm just sending a base64 token made up of
"a:b:c:d:e". I don't mind cloning the BasicAuthenticator if that's
what's required. I'm still not understanding how TC will handle my
modified header. I assume that if TC finds an
Jerry,
On 10/4/21 22:40, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
I really don't care whether it's called Basic, Malcolm, RollYourOwn, or
whatever. I was just emulating techniques I've had to implement as a
client for credit card gateways and other services in the past that all
use BASIC prefix with their own
Mark,
On 10/5/21 04:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 05/10/2021 03:40, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
An earlier post suggested I just implement a CredentialHandler, which
would be great. But it looked like the credential handler is given
"id/pw" extracted from the base64. Or will it actually return
On 05/10/2021 03:40, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
An earlier post suggested I just implement a CredentialHandler, which
would be great. But it looked like the credential handler is given
"id/pw" extracted from the base64. Or will it actually return whatever
it finds in the base64 token?
I really don't care whether it's called Basic, Malcolm, RollYourOwn, or
whatever. I was just emulating techniques I've had to implement as a
client for credit card gateways and other services in the past that all
use BASIC prefix with their own token definition. I can easily rename
the
Michael,
On 10/3/21 11:58, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2021-10-02 um 02:48 schrieb Jerry Malcolm:
I need to write a custom BasicAuthenticator class to decode a
specialized encoding of the authToken. I have been scouring google
for info. I found one post where the answer included the statement:
Am 2021-10-02 um 02:48 schrieb Jerry Malcolm:
I need to write a custom BasicAuthenticator class to decode a
specialized encoding of the authToken. I have been scouring google for
info. I found one post where the answer included the statement:
This would clearly violate Basic auth scheme and
Jerry,
On 10/1/21 20:48, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
I need to write a custom BasicAuthenticator class to decode a
specialized encoding of the authToken. I have been scouring google for
info. I found one post where the answer included the statement:
"Extending from AuthenticatorBase is a great
On 02/10/2021 01:48, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
I need to write a custom BasicAuthenticator class to decode a
specialized encoding of the authToken. I have been scouring google for
info. I found one post where the answer included the statement:
"Extending from AuthenticatorBase is a great idea,
I need to write a custom BasicAuthenticator class to decode a
specialized encoding of the authToken. I have been scouring google for
info. I found one post where the answer included the statement:
"Extending from AuthenticatorBase is a great idea, and you can avoid
Tomcat's standard
13 matches
Mail list logo
