The system i'm currently testing with is only a little test system,
it is not inteded to go productive in that configuration ;-)
But thanks for the tip you anyway. The jk.log has no error messages,
and here is the log grepped for "found best worker":
[Tue Oct 25 15:52:23 2005] [28304:49172] [debug
Doehler, Thomas wrote:
Hi,
IMO having 10 connections limit is way too low for any serious usage.
I would suggest that you rise maxProcessor to at least 100.
Also do you observe any error messages in mod_jk.log?
Regards,
Mladen.
--
Hi,
here the requested files:
workers properties:
---
#
# wokers.properties - configuration for mod_jk
#
# configure path separator
ps=/
# list of workers by name
worker.list=loadbalancer
worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=debi1, debi2
worker.load
Doehler, Thomas wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the quick response, jvmRoute is configured on both instances.
We do not use the standard tomcat url rewriting (which is
http://...;jsessionid=...?x=y),
we use simply a standard http paramter and do our own url rewriting.
Right, but it would be good that
Hi,
thanks for the quick response, jvmRoute is configured on both instances.
We do not use the standard tomcat url rewriting (which is
http://...;jsessionid=...?x=y),
we use simply a standard http paramter and do our own url rewriting.
Regards,
Tom
> Did you set the jvmRoute="your worker name"
Doehler, Thomas wrote:
Hi list,
I'm using apache 2.0.54 + mod_jk 1.2.14 on a debian 3.1 server.
I have 2 tomcat workers running on different machines.
Although I configured the load balancing worker with sticky_session=1, all
requests get spread over the tomcat workers in round robin.
My ques
Hi list,
I'm using apache 2.0.54 + mod_jk 1.2.14 on a debian 3.1 server.
I have 2 tomcat workers running on different machines.
Although I configured the load balancing worker with sticky_session=1, all
requests get spread over the tomcat workers in round robin.
My question is, how does mod_jk
