Hi, I'm a little confused as to the difference between the asynchronous and fastasyncqueue cluster replication types.
We're currently using asynchronous, our application only really needs replication to minimise the impact on users if a server dies, ie its not a hard requirement, I certainly don't want to allow replication to have any noticeable impact on response times, which is the bottom line in our application. However, I can't quite work out if fastasyncqueue is better in some way. Is it just an alternative implementation of asynchronous? Is it the future of async type replications? Does it have a lower memory/performance impact, better throughput or what? Any enlightenment, or indeed some performance figures if anyone has them, would be useful. Regards, Mark -- Mark Hagger [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
